The Query Corner

To what extent have our distinctive doctrinal positions been recognized by others before us? How nearly are our positions )on the prophecies, especially in Daniel and the Revelation, uniquely Adventist in origin and proclamation? Wherein do we differ from those who have recognized these truths?

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

To what extent have our distinctive doctrinal positions been recognized by others before us? How nearly are our positions )on the prophecies, especially in Daniel and the Revelation, uniquely Adventist in origin and proclamation? Wherein do we differ from those who have recognized these truths?

These are the legitimate and logical queries of an inquiring mind. It is either lack of investigation or erro­neous information that has led some to make unwarranted claims as to de­nominational patent rights to discov­ery and proclamation of many of our distinctive doctrines and prophetic in­terpretations. Rather, this movement has separated the gold from the dross and the true from the false, to present the glorious cluster of related truths in the light of the judgment hour and the impending advent of our Lord.

We err when we either claim or infer that most of the doctrinal truths or prophetic interpretations we stress originated with us. Nor is their pres­ent proclamation confined to our move­ment. The Seventh-day Sabbath was proclaimed by others, and still is. The second, personal, imminent advent of Christ ,is most vigorously proclaimed by many Fundamentalists. The truths relative to the nature of man, health reform, stewardship, and a score of other features, are variously empha­sized.

The outstanding difference is that by others they are held as single gems in a cluster of errors, and are presented apart from the threefold message of Revelation 14. The second advent, the Sabbath, and the ministry of Jesus in the sanctuary, with their related truths, cannot be separated in God's special message for the hour. And this unity is found nowhere save in this movement. But it is neither humili­ating nor compromising to recognize the part that others have played in hewing these foundations.

This is true in the realm of proph­ecy. Those familiar with the disserta­tions on prophecy extant when Elder Uriah Smith wrote his remarkable ex­position of the prophecies, are well aware of the origin of many of the positions he set forth. His was a work of segregation and assembling of the gems of prophetic truth glimpsed by those who had gone before. It is not an infallible book, but was remarkably free from errors for its time. Given sufficient time, practically all his posi­tions (aside from the sanctuary truth, which is unique in this movement) could be duplicated from the books he so assiduously studied. This is not said to the disparagement of this noble pioneer and his great book. Rather, it is in praise of his discernment. But we must recognize that there were other earnest pioneer students of prophecy. Even the view that the papacy rather than Turkey is the king of the north in Daniel 11, agitated a few years ago, was set forth in a book in the writer's possession, " Cox on the Book of Daniel," published in 1843. A recognition of these undeniable historical facts will temper any tendency to bombast, and give credit to whom credit is due.

This is God's chosen remnant move­ment. It has gleaned from a hundred sources the correlated system of truth we profess. Let us recognize prepara­tory agencies, giving them their full credit. Let us at the same time re­member that these agencies were but forerunners, and that God has thrown upon us the solemn responsibility for faithfully discharging our obligation to the world, and for separating truth from error in the field of historic, pro­phetic, and doctrinal interpretation.

L. E. F.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

July 1929

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Trenchant Truths

Faith is rooted in the substantial knowledge of facts, not in the effer­vescence of emotion.

Our Greatest Peril

A mere assent to the truth does not constitute righteousness.

Ministerial Internship Provision For North America

A new provision to bridge the gap between the training school and the field.

Ministerial Training Advances

Glimpses of ministerial training.

The Gospel Message in the Book of Revelation

Exploring the purpose of the work of Christ on our behalf.

Opening Doors for the Bible Worker

Medical missionary work as an entering wedge for the presentation of the message.

" A Little Folly "

The reputation for wis­dom and honor built up by years of diligent study, earnest prayer, and exemplary conduct, may suddenly become obnoxious because " a little folly " is allowed to drop into the spiritual ointment of the divine apothe­cary.

Seductive Popularity

The experience of a young preacher of a popular denomination came under my observation some time ago, and may serve as an object lesson regard­ing the hidden dangers in a minister's popularity.

New Joy in Life and Service

A personal testimony.

Roman Authorities

Valuable quotations from reliable sources

Study for Ourselves

Gem statements from the Spirit of Prophecy.

Editorial Postscripts

Closing thoughts from the Ministry back page.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - NAD Stewardship (160x600)