Sunday Laws and Commercialized Amusement

Sunday Laws and Commercialized Amusement*

I find myself in the very unusual position of being the only pastor in Hyattsville who is on the repeal side of the Sunday law question.

BY F. D. NICHOL

I find myself in the very unusual position of being the only pastor in Hyattsville who is on the repeal side of the Sunday law question. At the same time I am the pastor of the only church in this community whose membership as a body do not believe in attending movies on any day of the week. It is therefore evident at the outset that no desire for amusements and no possible connection with commercial interests can be attributed to me as a Seventh-day Adventist minister in opposing Sunday laws. The petitions on the other side of the question which have been read to the council concern themselves simply with the "liberaliz­ing" of the Sunday law as regards movies. I am not interested in liberalizing the law. Be­lieving that Sunday laws are wrong in prin­ciple, the only consistent position I can take is to petition for their repeal.

I believe they are wrong because they violate the great principle enunciated both by Bible writers and by the founding fathers of this country—the principle of the separation of church and state. In the centuries before the United States Government was established, church and state were to a greater or less de­gree united in every land. And all the hard­ships and persecutions to which religious mi­norities have been subjected through the cen­turies have resulted from such a union of church and state. When the religious majority in a state are able to register their beliefs on the statute books and can employ the arm of the law in support of their views, persecution to a greater or less degree inevitably follows. This is not a theory regarding government; it is a sad fact of history, written in tears and blood in the annals of all religious minorities. Some of the very denominations whose oppos­ing petitions you have heard tonight, were, in centuries past—among the religious minorities who thus suffered.

It was a new thing for the world to hear the founders of a nation declaring that the state has no right to legislate upon matters of reli­gion and conscience. But just such declarations were vehemently made by Washington, Jeffer­son, Madison, and others.

But while our Federal Government was so clearly established on this principle of the sep­aration of church and state, the matter was some­what different with the original colonies. Many of them had their beginnings about 150 years earlier, and had brought over with them from the old country the view of the union of church and state. Singularly enough, numbers of the early settlers had fled from Europe because they could not worship God as their conscience dictated. Yet they did not see that the only lasting guaranty of religious freedom was to dissolve the church-and-state union.

Sunday laws are a choice illustration of the religious legislation that formerly covered a wide field of conduct. In fact, in this country they are about the only definitely religious statutes that have come down to us. The early Sunday laws made no attempt to conceal their obviously religious character. The first Sunday law in Maryland opens thus: "Forasmuch as the sanctification and keeping holy the Lord's day commonly called Sunday, hath been and is es­teemed by the present and all the primitive Christians and people, to be a principal part of the worship of Almighty God, and the honor due to His holy name; Be it enacted," etc. The Sunday laws of the other early colonies were equally plain as to their religious nature. In fact, if a colonial had been asked whether a Sunday law was a religious law, he would have looked at you in amazement, wondering why you asked such an obvious question.

As the principles of the separation of church and state have to an increasing degree per­meated society through the years, the confess­edly religious reason for the enactment of a Sunday law has been dropped out of the re­vised codes; but they are religious laws just the same. No one with any knowledge of the history of Sunday legislation would attempt to argue that Sunday statutes, even in their more restrained language today, are not reli­gious laws. And it is because they are religious that I protest against them. The state ought not to be in the business of regulating religious conduct; the church ought not to ask for such aid. Both the church and the state suffer when any such partnership is effected. The church ought to rely, not on the arm of the law, but on the arm of the Lord for aid in advancing its cause.

It is true that the spirit of the times holds back to a great degree the evil effects that would logically come from a consistent enforce­ment of Sunday laws. But as long as such laws exist they are a potential source of danger, and always provide a weapon for some intoler­ant individual. It is only a short time ago that a member of my denomination was arrested for doing a little repair work in his house, painting some windows, on Sunday. He had kept "the seventh day" as God requires in the Sabbath command, and with clear conscience went to work on Sunday. But someone who believed differently took advantage of this Maryland Sunday law and had the man ar­rested. He spent five days in jail. His only crime was that he had violated a religious law.

I do not believe that such a law ought to be on the statute books. It can serve only as reli­gious laws have ever served in the past, to pro­vide a weapon for intolerance.

Washington, D. C.

* This statement recently made before the town council of Hyattsville, Maryland, in connection with the presentation of a petition against the State Sun­day law, is here made available in the hope that it may aid other workers confronted with a similarly deli­cate situation. In this instance an attempt was being made by the commercialized amusement interests to bring about a liberalizing of the State Sunday law. The motive was wholly mercenary, and the other churches were all opposed to it. But Elder Nichol, because of his religious liberty lectures, had been asked by the theater owners to support their endeavor. He told them that he could in no way join in their plea. but would doubtless have something to say on the larger principle of Sunday laws. His careful pres­entation needs no comment. In situations of this character we need to use great care lest we become allied, in the mind of the public, with commercialized amusement interests.—Editors


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

BY F. D. NICHOL

March 1933

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

The World's Morale Broken

The strength of an army is largely measured by its morale.

Are we Faithful to Our Trust?

We are told by historians that as the apostles died and new leaders arose, they gradually remodeled the church. Step by step they went farther and farther away from God—all due to the laxity of their lead­ers.

Union Executives and Evangelism

The choicest privilege afforded any man in the work of the third angel's message is to be out before the public in direct, aggressive, spiritual evangelism.

The Local Conference and Intensive Evangelism

To win souls should be the chief business of every conference and every worker.

A Revival of Potent Bible Preaching

Inspiration, counsel, and caution.

The Prophetic Gift

The prophetic gift is not the message or the gospel; neither is it the Bible; rather it is the method, or way, by which the divine message comes from God to man.

"The Two Anointed Ones"

The title of this study is found in Zechariah 4:14. This verse is the culmination of a wonderfully encouraging prophecy which God had given to Zerubbabel through his prophet Zechariah.

Successful Approach to Youth

Much study has been given through the years to the matter of successful work for our young people. The personality of the worker and the condition of the youth with whom he has to deal have much to do in determining the method best to be used. However, some general principles are worthy of review.

Editorial Keynotes

Spirituality and Standards

Great Blessings Attend Revival Meetings

The response of the field to the Battle Creek Autumn Council recommenda­tion that revival meetings be held during this winter in our churches, has been most encouraging, in fact, almost unanimous.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - RevivalandReformation 300x250

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)