Editorial Keynotes

Apostasy Marches On

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

A strange situation presents itself in  Presbyterian ranks, with a public con­troversy on between two Presbyterian church papers. That being possible under their form of organization and their concept of a church organ, the significant point is that it is an­other internecine clash between Fundamen­talism and Modernism, which issue is rocking all the leading denominations. Dr. Edmund B. Chaffee, Modernist, and editor of the Presby­terian Tribune, with twelve other Presbyterian churchmen, contesting Catholic Cardinal Hayes's use of Scripture in his famous anti­birth-control sermon, made the following amaz­ing statement:

"The longest argument in the cardinal's sermon and the one upon which he ultimately bases his case, is found in the statement that birth control is con­trary to the commandment of the Deity. This is true if by the Deity we mean the God that is found in ancient myth and legend. This is not true, how­ever, if by the Deity we mean the god who is re­vealed in the endless sweep of evolution and whose majestic message is being slowly translated by science into the accents of the human tongue. The lower down we go in the scale of evolution, the less limitation we find imposed upon the spawning process. The higher we rise, the more restriction and restraint is placed, we discover, upon the powers of reproduction. In other words, instead of violat­ing the law of nature and nature's God through birth control, we are merely giving sight and intel­ligence to what in nature is a blind and groping impulse. If the cardinal chooses to accept the literal interpretation of Old Testament statements as in­fallible doctrine, we register no complaint, nor should he complain if we choose instead to base our faith upon the evidence, the knowledge, and the experi­ence available in our own time."

This drew the fire of the Fundamentalist Presbyterian, with an uncomfortable series of analytical questions, the full significance of which should not be lost upon us. Be it re­membered that this is Fundamentalism's analysis of Modernism's bold and anti-Chris­tian platform. Note it:

"At the beginning of Doctor Chaffee's career as an ordained Presbyterian minister, he declared before God, in the presence of presbytery, that he 'be­lieved the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the word of God, the only infallible rule of faith and practice.' Now he writes the above state­ment. Quite seriously and with entire friendliness we ask Doctor Chaffee; 'How, sir, do you reconcile those two statements?'

"We believe this very practical item of public testimony from a Presbyterian minister brings out in a rather striking way some of the great fissures which divide our whole church from end to end.

"Is the God of Sinai a Deity of myth and legend'? "Is God revealed in 'the endless sweep of evolu­tion' and not in the Old Testament?

"Is revelation something that 'is being slowly translated by science into the accents of the human tongue' as contrasted with the 'Thus saith the Lord' of Holy Writ?

'Does man have to 'give sight and intelligence to what in nature is a blind and groping impulse,' and thus be god to the 'god of endless evolution,' other­wise impotent, incoherent, and ignorant? Is the Roman Catholic cardinal to be humored in his choice of 'accepting the literal interpretation of the Old Testament statements as infallible doctrine,' while he must permit his emancipated correspondents, 'if we choose, instead, to base our faith upon the evi­dence, the knowledge and the experience available in our own time?' "

Rebuttal by the Editorial Council of twenty, of the Modernist Tribune, complains in a very revealing way against the Fundamentalist at­tack as follows:

"Doctor Chaffee is attacked because the letter of the thirteen ministers asserts that not every state­ment in the Old Testament must be regarded as final truth. The attack on him implies that Presbyterian ministers are under obligation to hold Cardinal Hayes's views that all that is found in the Old Testa­ment is infallible doctrine.

"The issue here presented is that of Scriptural in­errancy. In the Presbyterian Church there are hun­dreds of ministers who receive the Bible, Old Testa­ment and New, as containing the revelation of God culminating in Christ ; who regard the Bible as in­spired by God ; who preach from the Bible and teach its truth ; who find in the Bible their spiritual home, who would be lost for their own lives and for their ministry without the Bible; and who yet do not consider themselves obliged to accept every state­ment in the Bible as 'without error,' They make no secret of their views. They hold that their views are not inconsistent with their assent to the church's constitutional question regarding the Scriptures. They take the words, 'only infallible rule of faith and practice,' to mean that the Bible infallibly guides to saving faith and right practice, not to mean that every statement in it regarding astronomy or geology or history is factually accurate. They think that by mentioning 'the Old and New Testaments' the con­stitutional question brings to attention the advance in knowledge of God from the Old Testament to Christ in the New. These ministers hold that while so believing and teaching they have a right to be ministers of the Presbyterian Church ; and they would be supported in their right by multitudes of lay people of the church."

Then, in a final rejoinder, the Fundamen­talist Presbyterian summarizes the issue thus:

"The issue we raised, the council says, is 'scrip­tural inerrancy.' So it is, but it is an issue raised, not by us, but by the standards of our church, and endorsed by every ordained officer who subscribes to this formula, viz., 'Do you believe the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the word of Got, the only infallible rule of faith and practice?' The position taken by the Editorial Council, on the con­trary, is that the Bible 'contains' the word of God. What view of Scripture Cardinal Hayes takes is not before us. nor are we asking any Presbyterian min­ister to find and adopt it. All we ask is, How can a minister sign a paragraph like that quoted from the letter to Cardinal Hayes, and make it go along with our Presbyterian position?

"That many hold the position voiced in the state­ment of the Editorial Council of the Tribune, we know to be true. There are so many, in fact, that we believe we were right in saying it brought out 'some of the great fissures which divide our whole church.' "

Thus we have before us another current illustration of the sad issues that wrack the great Protestant bodies. The fundamental issue is indeed "Scriptural inerrancy,"—whether the Bible is, or merely contains, the word of God. And this basic issue constitutes one of the great "fissures which divide our whole [Presbyterian] church," and the other great bodies of Christendom. On this, we as Adventists stand as a Fundamentalist unit. We must indeed know our ground thoroughly, for this is one of the great dividing lines of Christendom, underlying all other issues. And on this and similar departures, we are bound before God to lift our voices in exposure and warning. We are raised up as witnesses to truth and light in a world gone apostate, and plunging on into ever-increasing darkness.

L. E. F.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

May 1937

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Principles and Standards in the Use of Motion Pictures

A pronouncement and an appeal from the General Conference Committee.

Furlough Impressions

The deep impressions I saw, read, and heard on my return to America.

Which Version—Douay or Authorized?

When studying with Catholics, which version of the Word of God should be introduced, the Catholic Douay or the Protestant Authorized Version, and why?

Preaching Our Distinctive Message No. 2

Our continued look at how to address our message to the wider world.

Controlling Entire Issue of Newspaper

One of the first requisites in securing an en­tire issue of a newspaper is that the evangelist become a friend of the editor, the town officials, and others who can help him.

Habitual High Pitch No.1

A study of vocal pitches and offenses.

Nature of the Divine Unity

Is the nature and unity of the Son and the Father clear from John 10:30?

Why I Believe in the Spirit of Prophecy

It was my highly esteemed privilege to be closely associated with Mrs. E. G. White in connection with the estab­lishment and development of our sani­tariums and medical missionary work throughout the United States and Aus­tralia, from the year 1886 until the time of her death in 1915.

The Music of the Message

Our monthly music column.

Plans for a New Hymnal

At the 1936 session of the General Confer­ence the following recommendations were passed:

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - SermonView - Medium Rect (300x250)

Recent issues

See All