Clean and Unclean Meats

The question arises, Is there confusion in teaching that the record of clean and unclean meats of Leviticus II should be observed today, and at the same time teaching that the ceremonial law as a whole is done away with?

M.A.H. is office editor of the Ministry.

The question arises, Is there confusion in teaching that the record of clean and un­clean meats of Leviticus II should be observed today, and at the same time teaching that the ceremonial law as a whole is done away with? And would this be forbidden in I Timothy 4:3, 4?

There need be no difficulty in answering this question if there are set forth the broad principles upon which the facts are founded. God's word is the guide to knowledge for His followers, and Leviticus II gives information in a very explicit manner, classifying clean and unclean meats. In verses 46 and 47 it is stated: "This is the law . . . to make a difference between the unclean and the clean." In this same chapter in verses 4 to 8, the expression "unclean unto you" is used five times, and in the following verses "abomina­tion unto you" is used five times. Also the words "in abomination" and "an abomination" are used. But notice that the expression "unto you" is used ten times. Why? Leviticus zo: 24-26 answers in these words:

"I am the Lord your God, which have separated you from other people. Ye shall therefore put dif­ference between clean beasts and unclean, and be­tween unclean fowls and clean: and ye shall not make your souls abominable by beast, or by fowl, or by any manner of living thing that creepeth on the ground, which I have separated from you as unclean, And ye shall be holy unto Me: for I the Lord am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be Mine."

Here is set forth the fact that God, having separated Israel from other people in order that they might be a holy people, differentiates between clean and unclean meats for them. In this connection it may be of interest to call attention to the vision of Peter in the Acts of the Apostles, where the sheet filled with clean and unclean animals was let down for him to view, and he was instructed to "kill and eat." Peter refused. We learn by the explanation given in chapter To, verse 28, that God was teaching Peter that he should not call men clean or unclean, for God is no respecter of persons. And yet God does separate men from others even now, as will be noted in 2 Corin­thians 6:14-17.

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbe­lievers: . . . Come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the un­clean thing ; and I will receive you."

Here the apostle Paul sets forth the definite principle that God's people are a separate people and that they should leave unclean things alone. Paul further states:

"I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that there is nothing unclean of itself : but to him that esteemeth anything to be unclean, to him it is un­clean." Rom. 14:14.

The reason, therefore, that we esteem cer­tain foods unclean is that God has stated that the people whom He has separated unto Him­self to be holy unto Him are to "touch not the unclean thing"—meaning to abstain from unclean foods.

"But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priest­hood, a holy nation, a peculiar people ; that ye should show forth the praises of Him who bath called you out of darkness into His marvelous light." 1 Peter 2:9.

Some will refer to I Timothy 4 as condemn­ing any segregation. However, if we note Paul's words carefully, it will be seen that those who "depart from the faith" command "to abstain from meats, which God bath cre­ated to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth." Then Paul makes the statement that "every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving." This implies of course that only those who know the truth can do this, for as verse 5 says, "It [every creature] is sanctified [set apart] by the word of God." Hence everything is good that is set apart by the word of God, and not to be refused, the Word being our guide in making the decision. Consequently, if the food is not sanctified by the Word, it cannot be received with thanksgiving, and therefore should be re­fused.

We are also counseled in 1 Corinthians 1o: 5, 6 that we are not to make the failure Israel did by lusting after the evil things that God has forbidden, for the Spirit of prophecy instructs us ("Counsels on Health," page 473) that the Lord is bringing His people back to the original diet He gave man in the begin­ning. Since God is our Creator, He knows what is best for our bodies, and as He desires in these last days to have a clean people, they must necessarily partake of a clean diet.

The distinction made between the clean and unclean animals when the Lord gave Noah instruction regarding the clean and the unclean animals and fowls as they were to be taken into the ark [Genesis 7], antedates the instruc­tion given in the ceremonial law by hundreds of years. It was also clearly understood in the early sacrificial service that only clean ani­mals and clean fowls were to be used. Gen. 8:20. Note further that while the instruction in Leviticus II may be included as part of the ceremonial law, so also were the ten com­mandments, the worship of God, and the mediatorial work of Christ.

It might be well to notice other restrictions placed upon the flesh diet. Deuteronomy 12: 23 reads, "Only be sure that thou eat not the blood." (See also Genesis 9 :4; Leviticus 17: 30, 14; and 1 Samuel 34:33.) Further, Le­viticus 3:17 states, "It is a perpetual statute . . that ye eat neither fat nor blood." In a general council of the early Christian church, it is apparent that they distinguished between the ceremonial law as a whole and some of the unchanging restrictions, as in the command of the council "that they abstain from . . . things strangled, and from blood." In eating "clean" flesh, it must be bloodless and not "strangled." This would debar the fish sold in the markets today.

Hence we must conclude that the distinction given by the Lord in Leviticus II between clean and unclean meats holds good today, in­asmuch as this distinction between the crea­tures named there as clean and unclean has never been changed by the word of God.

M. A. H.

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

M.A.H. is office editor of the Ministry.

September 1939

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Reducing Losses and Retaining Gains

How can we reduce our losses and retain our gains?

The Early and Latter Rain—No. 1

Biblical exposition help for your consideration.

Reaching the Women of India

Can we not get a vision from this of one way to break down prejudice against Christianity and build up strong favorable impres­sions?

Training an African Ministry

It is now more than forty-five years since our mission work began among the Afri­can people. Ever since, it has been the object of our missionaries to train the Af­rican to bear responsibility.

Personality Involves A Pleasing Voice

Probably no greater compliment was ever paid to a man than Mark paid to Jesus when he wrote, "The common people heard Him gladly." But it was not only what Jesus had to say; it was also how He said it, that caused the common people to hear Him gladly.

Are You Hitting at Nothing?

A Searching Question for Each Worker

Music in Present-Day Evangelism

Music is a handmaiden of religion.

Qualifications of Ministers

Vital "Testimony" Counsels

Three Schools of Prophetic Interpretation

There are three leading systems of prophetic interpretation current in the reli­gious world. Each of these systems has many eminent advocates, and each group, of course, thinks its own system to be the only correct one.

Editorial Keynotes

True Friends Greatly Needed

Fundamental Advertising Principles

Behind every method for bringing goods to the notice of the public are certain sound principles.

The President's Leadership

The wise president, with the interests of the young people pulsating in his heart, will seek to know the youth

The Missionary Nurse in Burma

It is my firm conviction that no class of worker has filled a more useful place in the Lord's work in Burma than has the consecrated missionary nurse.

Maintaining Rhythm in Digestion*

Perhaps no laws of physiology are more commonly disregarded than those relating to digestion.

Institute at Paradise Valley

I have always wanted to be in some type of work where I could help our own church members learn the principles of proper diet and healthful living, so that they could prac­tice these principles in their homes. My op­portunity came when I had the privilege of conducting the nutrition classes in connection with the institute for church workers held at Paradise Valley Sanitarium in April of this year.

Loma Linda Nutrition School

A report from a recent institute held at Loma Linda from April 9 to 13.

Faithfulness in Health Reform

If ever there was a time that required and demanded the top point of efficiency in activities and endeavors, the present day does.

Dealing With the Tobacco Habit

Many of the men and women who come to our meetings, and have a desire to accept God's message, are apparently help­lessly bound by the tobacco habit. How can they find help?

Hebrew as a Tool Language

Our belief in the inspiration of the Bible makes the study of Hebrew particularly signifi­cant.

Bible Teaching in Our Schools—l

The secret of successful teaching of the word of God lies in the character of the teacher.

Editorial Postscripts

From the Ministry back page.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - Healthy and Happy Family - Skyscraper 160x600