Proper Attitudes in Our Publications

How much of the message dare we print? Shall we compromise and teach error? Shall we keep silent on such cardinal truths as the Sabbath and the second advent?

By L. H. CHRISTIAN, Vice-President of the General Conference

In giving the advent message to all the world today: we face three distinct perils, all of which are sure to increase in fu­ture years. First there is the danger that we will be too fearful and cautious, and tone down the message to please men. This danger is especially threatening in lands where there is censorship of the press and no religious freedom, or a very restricted freedom. The question in such places is: How much of the message dare we print? Shall we compromise and teach error? Shall we keep silent on such cardinal truths as the Sabbath and the second advent ? These are questions which can be answered only in the fields concerned. We know the message must be given even if it costs us our lives to give it. Press censor­ship is not always a matter of law, but often of caprice or prejudice. Sometimes it is ab­solute, and disobedience may mean that we can publish no more. Let us remember that God never commanded us to give all the mes­sage at all times. Even Jesus forbade His disciples for about a year to say that He was Christ. Yet they found the way and the time to make that truth known.

Second, there is danger that we become too harsh and critical, by attacking governments and prominent personalities, or by setting forth the truth in a manner that awakens needless prejudice and opposition. This danger is near in lands where liberty abounds and where people are given to very full and free speaking. Some will ask: How much about nations and governments should our papers print, and how can we produce vigorous, up-to-date, salable publications unless we feature these things? We will answer these questions later. Here we wish first to discuss the third danger, per­haps the greatest of all—the peril that in our preaching of the message we become too po­litical and deal too much with outside, material events and conditions.

As an illustration of this third pitfall we would mention the many Adventist articles and sermons on the question of war. Now wars and rumors of war are a sign of the times, and as the papers are full of these things, it is easy to stress them in our own publications. While we would not be radical or oppose all preaching of the signs of war, we are convinced that this is greatly over­done among us today. Jesus prophesied of two great events—the end of the world and the destruction of Jerusalem. The latter event was right upon them in the early church; yet as far as the records go, the apostles never referred to the coming destruction of Jeru­salem. It was made known in other ways, and when it came, it was an evidence to many that Jesus was a true prophet. That prophecy would have gained popularity with the Ro­mans; yet in emphasizing the coming fate of Jerusalem it would have utterly destroyed any chance the early apostles might have had to win the Jews for Christ.

Is there not in this a lesson for us today ? Why should we in preaching the signs of the second coming of Christ make war so promi­nent, when the early Christians seemed to have said nothing at all in public about Jesus' prophecy regarding Jerusalem? Would not our message make a much stronger appeal to thoughtful people, and would it not give less offense, if we dwelt more on the spiritual signs and on prophecies already fulfilled and avoided setting forth sensational speculations concern­ing war and other world events, whether pres­ent or future? It is a sure sign of weakness when editors and writers depend on pictures and articles concerning prominent rulers and nations to make their paper succeed. We can write in a telling, captivating, compelling way. and not be fanciful or extreme. We should shun all slang and sensationalism, but re­member that platitudes are like deadly poison.

In writing of the signs of our Lord's return our editors must necessarily discuss current events. This dissertation on current events should be such as to make plain that God rules and overrules in the affairs of men. We are never to accuse or rail at government au­thorities or leading personalities. We are to study current events in the light of the gos­pel, and tell the story in such an interesting way that people will trust in God and believe yet more firmly in the second advent. What we have said concerning the discussion of cur­rent events applies also to special questions such as trade-unions or capital and labor.

"Let not those who write for our papers make unkind thrusts and allusions that will certainly do harm, and that will hedge up the way and hinder us from doing the work that we should do in order to reach all classes, the Catholics included. It is our work to speak the truth in love, and not to mix in with the truth the unsanctified elements of the natural heart, and speak things that savor of the same spirit possessed by our enemies. All sharp thrusts will come back upon us in double measure when the power is in the hands of those who can exercise it for our injury. Over and over the mes­sage has been given to me that we are not to say one word, not to publish one sentence, especially by way of personalities, unless positively essential in vindicating the truth, that will stir up our enemies against us, and arouse their passions to a white heat. Our work will soon be closed up, and soon the time of trouble, such as never was, will come upon us, of which we have but little idea."--Testimonies, Vol. IX, p. 241.

The advent awakening is a movement of prophecy. The very contents of our message are such that the prophetic word becomes the basis of a large share of our teaching. For this reason we must give careful study to the best way to present the prophecies. There are in the advent message itself two outstand­ing prophecies concerning our time that are not yet fulfilled. One of these is the United States in prophecy. It is needful to teach this, but we submit that the less this prophecy is preached in the British Empire and in other countries, the better. We have heard many sermons on it overseas, but we never have found that they did much good. In America, too, we should be wise and careful in explain­ing this prophecy, for in the future it will no doubt stir up great hatred.

The other prophecy is the fall of Babylon. The question of how to tell of the failure and fall of other denominations is a very delicate one. While we have not been called as a people to interpret many prophecies concerning nations, we have been instructed to give the message that "Babylon is fallen." We know that Babylon includes mother and daughter ; that is, all the major churches of modern Christianity. There is today a large church-unity movement on, perhaps the largest re­ligious activity of our day. To pass this by in silence would be to hide our light under a bushel. We are told that the time has come when the people in many lands will "in amaze­ment . . . hear the testimony that Babylon is the church, fallen because of her errors and sins, because of her rejection of the truth sent to her from heaven."—"The Great Contro­versy," p. 607.

It seems that the testimony, "Babylon is fallen," will bring on the last persecution. But we would not be true to duty if we neglected this important part of the advent message. However, we are to remember that the pur­pose of this message is to call God's people out of Babylon, lest they be partakers of her sins and receive of her plagues. We should approach this question of the fall of Babylon in the same spirit of sincere regret and sor­row in which Jesus wept over Jerusalem. Many godly men in other churches today are discouraged. They see the state of the churches, and in a spirit of pessimism believe in the downfall of the present religious body.

In giving this message concerning the fall of Babylon, what should be our attitude toward the Catholic Church? To this question we would reply, No attack should ever be made on Catholics as men or women, or even on the Pope himself. We believe, too, that the less discussion there is of the political activity of the Papacy, the better we will serve the cause of God. Those Protestants who think of the Roman question as a political issue mis­understand the gospel. It seems to us further that we should avoid stories concerning the moral depravity of the priests, the escapades of nuns. Many of these stories are not true, and to tell them excites great opposition among the Catholics. The less we endeavor to be­lieve in the human priesthood of any church, and the more we exalt the priesthood of Christ in His sanctuary service, the more godly, honest Catholics we will win.

In preaching Christ to mankind, our pur­pose is not social or political reform, nor is it neighborhood betterment or even education or culture, though all these good things might be by-products of accepting the message. This being true, we are not to deal with contro­verted political or international issues in our publications. We search the New Testament in vain for a single instance in which the apostles discussed such questions. While Ad­ventists are to be loyal citizens of their re­spective countries, and while they have all the rights of good citizens, their calling is not to engage in party politics or struggles. In view of all this, it is very evident that all criticism of every government and every kind of government should be avoided. The apostle Paul exhorts us to pray for kings and for all who are in authority, but never in the Scrip­tures are we told to condemn governments. Even Christ when He stood before Pilate was most considerate, and won that unjust ruler by the kind words: "Thou couldst have no power at all against Me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered Me unto thee hath the greater sin." John 19:10, 11.

In dealing with governments and govern­n-tent officials, we should remember this re­spectful attitude of our Saviour. We would refer again to articles on the Bible prophecies. The remnant church itself is a fulfillment of many prophecies. In our writing we give much attention to prophetic exposition. It is fortunate that through the years we have dealt very little with the specific details of how future prophecies were to be fulfilled. The Adventist position is that no writer should ever do this unless he understands and accepts the Adventist principles of prophetic inter­pretation. We are to study prophecy, but we are never, ourselves, to prophesy. Nor are we ever to make literal prophecies symbolic, or symbolic prophecies literal.

No editor or preacher should ever indulge in speculative, detailed presentations of how prophecies will be fulfilled in the future. Such questions as the beast from the bottomless pit, certain aspects of Armageddon, parts of Reve­lation 17 or Daniel i 1, with other prophecies the fulfillment of which is yet future, should be handled with great reserve, and should never be made the basis of sensational accounts of things to come. What has been said applies also to prophecies concerning various Old Testament nations. How many unfortunate statements were made here and there, for in­stance, during the recent war between Italy and Ethiopia. We found some who took whole prophecies concerning Ethiopia that were fulfilled more than two thousand years ago, and applied them to our day. We should beware of all fads and all fanciful interpreta­tions. Idle speculations concerning prophecies about such countries as Edom, Moab, and Tyrus, applied to modern nations like Japan, Great Britain, and others, are positively per­nicious.

Another item that should be discussed is our relation to civilization in general, and especially to the ignorance, poverty, and super­stition that are seen in many countries. We should make plain that every civilization is a fruit of religion. But while no civilization ever started aside from religion, the religion itself cannot be fully charged with all the crimes, poverty, and other evils of that civili­zation. Only editors who are citizens of the country concerning which they speak, should write about prevailing ignorance and poverty, and then only in a spirit of helpful sympathy. No editor should ever criticize the poverty or social conditions in other lands. This has been done all too often, and sometimes almost in a way that might lead people to think that editors delighted to reveal dark or muddy things.

Concerning the proper attitude of witnesses for the advent message, both today and here­after, read "The Great Controversy," page 6o6. May God, through the guidance of His Spirit in His church, grant our faithful editors the wisdom and courage needed today.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By L. H. CHRISTIAN, Vice-President of the General Conference

December 1939

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Forward Despite All Difficulties

There has never been a time when the chil­dren of God did not have to face difficulties in their efforts to promote the interests of His sacred cause.

Editorial Defenders of the Faith-2

In article No. 1, Professor Andreasen set forth several guiding principles which show how our editors and periodicals may be defenders of the faith. Near the close, he pointed out certain landmarks which all workers would do well to keep in mind. Those discussed were, maintaining true Funda­mentalism, and the right use of the Testimonies. He continues with the next point, on the doctrine of creation.

The Pastor's Yearly Program

The year's program should be divided into certain well-defined periods.

Conference Directory Invaluable

In a conference as large as Michigan, with one hundred seven churches which have a combined membership of more than ten thousand, a comprehensive church directory is imperative if efficient and effective work is to be accomplished.

Obtaining Names in an Effort

As a preliminary to getting large numbers of names, we must get large congregations.

The Evangelist and Music

We need to recognize the place of the consecrated musical evangelist.

Return of Science to Religion

It is true that science can do much to make the world more com­fortable and to fill it with an abundance of those materials that make for the welfare of mankind. But when science was adopted into the realm of philosophy and came near to being a religion, it utterly failed to live up to expectations.

Facing India's Problem—No. 2

Probably every indigenous worker and every missionary in India, including those in our own ranks, could point to examples of individuals and groups who have improved their economic and social status by becoming Christians.

Native Evangelism in Africa

The gospel did not reach Africa as soon as it did other lands, and for ages Africa has been sleeping in the darkness of sin.

Editorial Keynotes

Ideals of Presentation—No. 2

Time, An Irreplaceable Commodity

The value of little things.

Development of Our Medical Work—No. 1

A brief history from 1866-1896

Basis of Protection From Disease

It is of interest to note some of the statutes which the Lord had given to afford protection from the diseases and curses which prevailed in Egypt. Leviticus 13 and 14 are devoted entirely to instruction regarding the course to be pursued should some contagious or in­fectious disease appear.

Thorough Qualification Needed

In the innermost nature of mankind there it resides an inborn desire for health, a dread of pain and suffering, and a certain pride in well-being and efficiency.

A Touching Story of Korea

Many and sad are the experiences that come to doctors and nurses who labor in these lands where the value of a life is esti­mated in actual dollars and cents.

Principles of Hymn Choice—No. 2

Let us now consider some of the govern­ing principles of aesthetics, so important in the evaluating of hymn tunes, and the basic laws of beauty as seen in operation in various tunes.

Dispensationalism's Fallacies—No.2

One of the best ways of meeting the dis­pensationalist is to convince him that the Scriptures do not support the idea of dividing Biblical history up into seven dispensations, more or less, and then meet each of the errors of dispensationalism.

Editorial Postscripts

From the Editor's desk.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - NAD Stewardship (160x600)