Misconceptions of Adventist Belief

Seventh-day Adventists have never taught a material millennial king­dom, with a reign of Christ on this earth.

By V. J. JOHNS, Pastor, College Church, Loma Linda, California

In an article on "The Second Coming of Christ" in the Methodist Christian Advo­cate, William P. King writes: "The whole pro­cedure of dealing with Daniel and Revelation, as with all of the prophetic literature, is fan­tastic and imaginary. Adventist writers exer­cise the liberty of making anything mean what they want it to mean."—August 21, 1941, Ac­cording to Doctor King, "these authors wrote for the strengthening of the hope and courage of their contemporaries," and the "time of the authors, or the immediate future," rather than the far-distant future, is comprehended in the messages of the two books.

So central in our religious thinking is the blessed hope of the second coming of Christ, and so fundamental to our faith are the prophe­cies of the Bible, that we do not realize that there are many who identify the second coming with the gradual triumph of the spirit of Christ in the world, along with the gradual develop­ment of His kingdom. The answer to Doctor King's false interpretation of the doctrine of the second coming is as follows:

First, to appeal to the words of Jesus and the apostles regarding the manner of Christ's coming. If words have meaning, the coming of Jesus is personal, literal, visible, and cata­clysmic.

Second, to appeal to the prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation, with their sweep of the centuries, to include not only the events imme­diately preceding the second coming, but also the end of sin and death, the purifying of the earth, and the eternal home of the redeemed. If the picture of the four world kingdoms of Daniel 2 and Daniel 7, with the grand finale of world events and the establishment of Christ's kingdom, has merely a local fulfillment in the days of Daniel, then words fail signally to convey their meaning. And so, too, with the other prophecies of these books.

Doctor King's interpretation is the interpre­tation of Modernism. He applies the book of Daniel to the time of Antiochus Epiphanes, which was more than three centuries after the visions were given to the prince of Israel in the land of Babylon. If three centuries could be comprehended in the prophecy, surely three millenniums could be as easily comprehended. But modern criticism rejects prophecy, and, in so doing, rejects the mightiest defense to the inspiration of the Scriptures. The critic dates the book of Daniel in the time of Antiochus„ and thus discredits the greatest of all the pro­phetic books of the Old Testament. Every student of prophecy should read "Studies in the Book of Daniel," series one and two, by Robert Dick Wilson (Revell, New York City), for a scholarly and authoritative answer to the critics' contention that the book of Daniel was the work of some unknown Hebrew patriot of the times of Antiochus.

That Doctor King is not at all conversant with the teachings of Seventh-day Adventists is apparent from his statement, in the same article, that Adventists teach "a thousand years of physical reign of Christ on earth." It is a bit amusing to note that he cites as the two leading exponents of Adventism, "W. A. Spicer, author of 'Beacon Lights of Proph­ecy'," and the "Scofield Reference Bible" ! The fact is Seventh-day Adventists reject as un­scriptural the dividing of time into dispensa­tions and the material millennial kingdom as taught by the Scofield Bible. Doctor Scofield and W. A. Spicer are as far apart as the poles in their theology. Adventists teach the thousand-years reign of the saints as in heaven, not on earth. Their view is the Bible picture of a desolate earth and a heavenly reign during the millennium.

The second coming of Christ, without a visible return for the raising of the righteous dead, the translation of the righteous living, the destruction of sin and sinners, would not be the second coming of Christ. The prophe­cies of Daniel and the Revelation have a mighty bulwark of support in the doctrines of the Gospels and the Epistles. Bible truth is a harmonious whole. The "more sure word of prophecy" unites its testimony with the author of the other books of the Bible. Moreover, if the prophecies of Daniel and the Revelation are not directed toward the climax of human history in the second coining of Christ, what shall we do with the words of Jesus Himself in the prophecy on the mount? Is Matthew 24 concerned only with the days of Jesus and the apostles, and not with the events of the far-distant' future and His second coming?

Doctor King declares that "the doctrine of Adventism is contrary to the historic creeds of the church, all the way from the Apostles' Creed down to the Twenty-five Articles of Religion of Methodism." It is true that Ad­ventists care not for the creeds of the church, either Roman Catholic or Protestant. They earnestly contend, however, for the faith of the Bible. Their appeal for authority in teaching the doctrine of the second coming, the resur­rection and translation of the saints, the mil­lennial reign in heaven, and the new earth of eternity, is to Jesus and the prophets. It is interesting to note that the clear-cut prophecies of the books of Daniel and the Revelation have been taught by the greatest of all Bible exposi­tors. The Protestant Reformation, and pre-Reformation, from the days of Wycliffe to the days of John Knox, were carried forward by men who found the picture of the Papacy por­trayed in prophecy.

Again we repeat that Seventh-day Adventists have never taught a material millennial king­dom, with a reign of Christ on this earth.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By V. J. JOHNS, Pastor, College Church, Loma Linda, California

March 1942

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Extensive Every-Night Evangelism Needed

Extracts from a statement made at the General Conference Officers' meeting held in Battle Creek, Michigan, just prior to the 1941 Autumn Council.

Facing the Modern Audience

The gen­eration to whom we now go with the message of truth for this hour has undergone a tragic change in thought and mental attitude toward those great fundamentals which gripped the minds of their forebears.

Adherence to Church Standards

In the light of the recent Autumn Council action adopting a uniform baptismal cer­tificate and summary of faith, it is well to restudy the 1941 General Conference action on "Adherence to Church Standards" and depre­cation of independent standards.

Radio Evangelism in Action

A Discussion of Plans, Methods, and Objectives.

Some of Burma's Evangelistic Problems

A survey of mission problems, methods, and relationships.

Difficult Days for Missions

Meeting the demands of the task ahead.

Gathering Jewels for the Kingdom

A bible worker interchange.

The Greater Bible Work—No. III

Part eight of our look at the bible worker.

Junior Choir in Child Evangelism

Emphasizing child evangelism in the church.

Frank Admission Regarding Sunday

The reasons assigned for Sundaykeeping have been various and specious.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - RevivalandReformation 300x250

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)