Editorial Keynotes

Sound and Pseudo Scholarship.

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry

Sometimes brethren returning from spe­cial study under godless teachers in the universities of the world are perplexed over the indifferent reception accorded the choice titbits of specialized knowledge they have retrieved and now seek to inject into their work. Sometimes they feel there is lack of under­standing and appreciation for their new treas­ures of learning. And in instances they even complain of coolness or suspicion on the part of their ministerial brethren.

Perhaps a friendly word may help to clarify the problem, which is really quite simple: That which does not minister directly to and upbuild this message is not destined to arouse much enthusiasm in our ministerial ranks. For ex­ample, much historical research lauded by the world is not even remotely connected with the unveiling and illumination of the conflict be­tween the true church and the false through the centuries, and sheds no particular light on the divine philosophy of history involved in our in­terpretation of prophecy. It is this detachment that removes it from the center of our interests. We have a specific message to give the world, and we need and want that which will help us better to understand and present that message.

Much that is proffered by the universities in the field of Biblical languages usually has no vital relation to, nor practical utility in, the task of pastors, evangelists, and Bible instruc­tors in their specific work of winning and up-building souls through God's special message for today. Likewise, much in the realm of sci­ence has nought to do with the stalwart defense of creationism as against evolutionism, which is one of our major tasks as a movement, under the mandate of the third angel's message.

Scholarly contributions to knowledge must, in order to appeal to the ministry of the advent movement at large, be cast in the distinctive mold of this message and be integrally tied to its concepts and objectives. They must have definite and constructive relationship thereto. They must offer practical utility in the up-building, defense, and promulgation of our cause. The wisdom of the world and its univer­sities is for the most part rationalistic, or at least modernistic, in tone. Even if taught by professedly Christian teachers, these scholars of the world are usually unaware of, and not in­frequently antagonistic to, the distinctive prin­ciples and involvements of Adventism. Yet their methods, emphases, and conclusions are not infrequently reflected by Adventist students coming forth from their classes.

Such university guidance neither matches our needs nor aids our interests. Such worldly con­tributions may be brilliant, and from that view­point technically true, and yet be of little worth to our movement. Usually they are purely ob­jective in treatment, and tentative in conclu­sion. The counsels of such teachers are gener­ally couched in another phraseology, having an entirely different emphasis and purpose, and are often centered on matters of little importance to us. They do not usually build faith, and not infrequently they divert attention away from 'primary essentials to matters of really trifling import. More than that, their offerings are of t-times irreconcilable with the inspired truth of Scriptures and the witness of the Spirit of prophecy. - Thus their impulse and results are often foreign to the spirit, form, and terminol­ogy of the throbbing heart of our message. That is why our workers often look askance at echoes of the world's wisdom.

We need genuine wisdom, not a show of learning. We want and we welcome constructive help, not fastidious erudition. The university spirit and objective is not the spirit and objective of this movement. Yet this type of knowledge persistently seeks entrance amongst us in the form of a neo-Adventism. Were it to gain a foothold in our ranks, it would spell ruin for this movement, as it has for all other denominations where it is ascend­ant. It must be resisted. It is not difficult to differentiate between true knowledge, accept­able to God, and pseudo wisdom, that is the pride of man. We welcome the true; we reject the false.                                                      

L. E. F.

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry

May 1944

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

The Imperatives of Leadership

Timing, intelligence, courage, and dynamic forces.

The Positive Aspects of Creationism

Much of our attention has been geared toward the negative aspects of evolution that we have neglected to build up a positive case for creation­ism.

Why Introduce the Bible Instructor?

The role of the bible instructor in the body of Christ.

A Young Woman's Profession

The call for bible instructor's continues.

Delivering the Commissioned Messages

A look at the work of Ellen White.

The Young Minister and Music

Why should a theological student spend very much time on music?

Romanism and Spiritism

A look at religious world trends.

Pianist's Role in Evangelism

There are many factors which contribute to making a pianist an asset to an evangelistic effort.

Securing Co-operation of Church Members

Here are twelve practical suggestions on securing the help of your congregation.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - SermonView - Medium Rect (300x250)

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)