Meeting Opposition and Emergencies

We can arouse opposition in a meeting by preaching in a manner which is too provocative and challenging

By CLIFFORD A. REEVES, Atlantic Union Conference Evangelist

It happened at a Sunday night evangelistic meeting. The preliminaries had concluded with a soul-stirring gospel solo rendered by our song leader. I had finished the introduction and was getting to closer grips with the subject of the eve­ning—Spiritualism—when I became aware of a subdued murmur which seemed to come from the rear of the large gathering. As I proceeded to outline the Scripture teaching of the unconscious sleep of the dead, the murmur changed to an angry cry as a man half rose from his seat to shout, "That is a lie!"

Ignoring the interruption, I continued to preach. Meanwhile our chief usher had speedily made his way to the objector and quietly reminded him that the speaker had offered to meet with anyone at the close of the lecture who cared to discuss or dis­pute any point. (I make such a statement in in­troducing a topic which might be controversial.) He then warned the offender that this was a re­ligious service and we could not allow any dis­turbance. Should he persist, we would request him to leave the auditorium.

It now became apparent that there was a group of Spiritualists present, of whom this man was the leader. With their support he was emboldened to continue raising his voice in objection. Other ush­ers were moving in the direction of the disturb­ance. The chief usher, in a kind but firm manner, was urging the demonstrators to leave the meet­ing. I had continued preaching, raising my voice to drown out the sounds of dissent, leaving it with the ushers, if possible, to handle the situation.

Since the disturbance continued, I stopped my lecture and said, "I have already offered to discuss any point with any person after the meeting. If our friend wants to give a lecture in opposition, it is his privilege to hire a hall and do so. It is not fair play to take advantage of this meeting to air his views." I had hardly resumed the lecture when again there were further sounds of protest. Immediately I turned to the audience and said, "Freedom of speech is one of the great principles for which this nation is fighting, and for which our boys are giving their lives on the battlefield. You people have come here tonight to hear my lecture. All who want to have me continue, please say 'Aye.'" The loud volume of "Ayes" that resounded through the 'auditorium effectively silenced the op­position. In a few moments they filed'out looking somewhat shamefaced.

I think of another experience we had during a theater effort in another country. One night a band of young men filed in and sat together in a group. As I began to preach, they hurled critical comments and sneering remarks. This was organ­ized opposition. Our ushers were equal to the sit­uation. The chief usher gathered his men together and stood near the group while he gave me the signal. (We had arranged that in case of need he would raise his right hand as a signal to me to announce a hymn, during the singing of which he would persuade the opposition to retire.) While the audience sang, led by the booming notes of the pipe organ, the ushers efficiently and expeditiously conducted the hecklers through a side door of the theater, and we were free once again to continue the lecture in peace. We later learned that this band of young communists had come with the in­tention of breaking up the meeting.

Occasionally, as in the first experience, it is nec­essary for the speaker to stop his lecture to deal with interrupters. This should be avoided if pos­sible, as it only serves to break the continuity of the service and further advertise the disturbance. Looking back through twenty years of evangelistic experience I remember but few occasions in which the ushers could not adequately handle the situa­tion when they had been carefully prepared and instructed beforehand meet such emergencies.

In fearlessly proclaiming a reform message that cuts across popular beliefs at so many points there is always the likelihood that someone in our audi­ence will take exception and audibly express his disapproval. Then there is the constant possibility that some person may faint or be overcome with sickness, or a "drunk" may straggle into the meeting. Once a man died of heart failure during one of my meetings in London. All such contingencies de­mand that ushers should have a well-understood plan of action which will go into operation quickly and calmly as soon as any disturbance arises.

We can arouse opposition in a meeting by preaching in a manner which is too provocative and challenging. And when opposition is roused, a tactless, harsh, or unkind word can swing the sympathies of the audience over to the side of our opponents.

Let us be careful always to maintain a high spir­itual tone in our meetings, and we shall not then be reduced to the necessity of adopting the direct and violent method used by one redoubtable preacher in the early days of the message. His eyes ablaze with righteous anger he would de­scend from the rostrum and take off his Prince Al­bert coat. Carefully folding he coat, he would place, it on a front seat and then proceed to eject the interrupters from his tent by physical force; afterward he would don his coat and resume his sermon. This method would not be fitting today.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By CLIFFORD A. REEVES, Atlantic Union Conference Evangelist

October 1945

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Meeting the Specious "Scapegoat" Charges

The following article is the substance of a chapter in a forthcoming pamphlet which has been written in an­swer to E. B. Jones' pamphlet: "Forty Bible-Supported Reasons Why You Should Not Be a Seventh-day Ad­ventist."

Our Attitude Toward Music

Our monthly music column.

Saturday and Sunday in the Coptic Church

The problem and early history of the Coptic Church regarding the Sabbath.

The Procedures in "Numbering" Israel

How our denominational statistics are made up

Week of Sacrifice, November 24

The Week of Sacrifice and the Week of Prayer offerings are to be combined again into one offering this year.

Sabbath Prior to Captivity

How may one answer this argument that the Sabbath day was not originally a day of public worship?

The Roman Catholic Church

Our continued look at various religions and denominations.

Recent Sabbath-Sunday Declarations

The appearance of the following declarations given in full from late Roman Catholic sources demonstrates two things: First, that there is constant request on the part of readers to have the Catholic position on the Sabbath and Sunday clarified. Second, that the Roman Catholic Church is most frank in its statements that it is responsible for the change of the Sabbath. These admissions are highly quotable.

Editorial Keynotes

Frequent Worker Transfers Foster Weakness

The High Calling of the Pastor

In a special sense the pastor is an ambassador for Christ, to win, by the power of divine love, lost souls from sin to righteousness.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - RevivalandReformation 300x250

Recent issues

See All