Medicine and the Changing World*

Our Health Message a Part of Our World Mission

By WILLIAM F. NORWOOD, Ph.D., Dean, Los Angeles Division, CM.E

The noted Dr. Benjamin Rush, the best-known Philadelphia physician of his day, pompously declared in 1789 that he found all schemes bf physic (medicine) faulty, and that he was there­fore evolving "a more simple and consistent sys­tem of medicine" 1 than the world had yet seen. The Rush hypothesis, it soon appeared, was based upon a belief that all diseases were one, and like­wise that all treatments were thus reduced to one. Dr. Rush's declaration greatly impressed his con­temporaries, and left its author nursing the de­lusion that he hail rendered medicine the same sort of service as the immortal Newton contrib­uted to physics. To his believing students in Philadelphia, Rush further remarked:

"I have formerly said that there was but one fever in the world. Be not startled, Gentlemen, follow me and I will say there is but one disease in the world. The proximate cause of disease is irregular, convulsive or wrong action in the system affected. This, Gentle­men, is a concise view of my theory of disease. . . . I call upon you, Gentlemen, at this early period either to approve or disapprove of it now." 2

Most of his students did approve, and went out over the United States practicing the heroic tech­niques of purging and bleeding. These treatments were supposed to re-establish health by a process of exhaustion.

European physicians joined with fellow Ameri­cans in praising both Rush's theory and his prac­tice. Dr. Lettsom, in London, said that Rush united "in an almost unprecedented degree sagacity and judgment." A Dr. Zimmerman in Hanover announced that not only Philadelphia but all hu­manity should raise a statue to the American prodigy. When Rush died in 1813, he was widely acclaimed the greatest physician his country had known.

Only thirty years later, however, Rush's medi­cal philosophy was subjected to a re-evaluation. Elisha Bartlett, a prominent member of the pro­fession in the 5840's, rather shockingly remarked of Rush's medical essays : "It may be safely said, I think, that in the whole vast compass of medical lit­erature, there cannot be found an equal number of pages containing a greater amount and variety of utter nonsense and unqualified absurdity. . . ."4

Why was Rush lauded by one generation and re­pudiated by the next? Simply because far-reach­ing changes were taking place. Rush, one of the last leaders of the eighteenth century, was not en­tirely divested of medieval tradition. The newer generation witnessed the beginnings of the meta­morphosis of the older art into modern science.'

Benjamin Rush was not the only notable in the healing art whose theory of disease failed to stand. Much of the history of medicine is devoted to the rise and fall of theories and systems. In­deed, how much of today's medicine was known to yesteryear? Further, what portion of accepted practice today will survive unaltered ? When you are ready to take the National Board examina­tions, you may be quizzed on aspects of chemother­apy or antimicrobial agents, the scant knowledge of which a short time before did not justify their consideration in lectures.

Further emphasis on the rapid changes in medi­cal science in a speech to medical students who are trying desperately to get into step with this on­ward march would be sheer prolixity. There are other changes, however, occurring within the framework of modern man's social structure, which might well be considered by fledgling phy­sicians as well as by seasoned members of the healing art.

When Rush occupied the chair of theory and practice of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, a student could attend two terms of three to four months each (the second was a repetition of the first), present a not too erudite thesis, and have con­ferred on him the Doctor of Medicine degree. The premedical requirements at first were specific but limited—three years of apprenticeship under a rep­utable physician, and a knowledge of Latin and the natural sciences. As the decades of the nineteenth century came and went, less was said of prelimi­nary requirements, and more emphasis was placed on the volume of students accommodated by the faculties in a rapidly increasing number of medical schools, not a few of which were little more than diploma mills.

Under little or no State regulations, American medical schools turned out thousands of M.D.'s, with only this meager formal medical training in addition to an apprenticeship. An even larger number sallied forth to practice without qualifying for the degree. Indeed, many a practitioner never saw an anatomy laboratory or hospital ward, or ever heard a formal lecture.

They were a vigorous lot, these general practitioners who succored the ills of the nation during its period of westward expansion. The relatively few who had a liberal education in many instances served their communities as preachers, judges, or lawyers.

Now the picture has changed. The frontier pioneer days passed with the turn of the century. Concurrently medicine gave birth to the special­ties. The profession has encouraged State regula­tion of licensure, and has undertaken to establish and enforce standards of premedical and medical education.

In an effort to keep up with the rapidly expand­ing borders of science, medical education has tended to crowd everything out of the curriculum but science. The specialties which ought to be in­tegrated for the better understanding and treatment of disease have too often divided mortal man into spheres of influence. Thus modern discoveries have broadened our frontiers to an almost unman­ageable extent.

In medicine, one is bound to deal with human life as a whole. We can only agree with A. E. Clark-Kennedy, dean of London Hospital Medical School, that "a purely scientific education is inade­quate for the profession of medicine, and medical education is losing touch with the humanities at a time when the power of medicine to prolong life, relieve pain, influence endocrine secretion and to some extent instinct, control birth, dominate the mind, and even change the structure of the brain and modify personality, has increased, is increas­ing, and is likely to increase still further."

Tremendous power is thus coming into the hands of medicine. The greater the power, the greater will be the moral and ethical issues. Is medical education, as it is now organized, produc­ing suitable custodians of these forces? The foun­ders of the College of Medical Evangelists were well aware that man does not live by bread alone; that the physician must deal with human person­ality, human hopes, human fears, and human fail­ings—the things a the spirit.

Let not the sagacity of the founding fathers lead students of medicine and the affiliated schools to conclude that by lock-stepping through the curric­ula of this college, including its courses in religion, they will automatically emerge polished products "throughly furnished unto all good works."

The burden is on each of you individually to synthesize human suffering, material forces, and spiritual values into a large interpretation of your duty and responsibility to God and mankind. Un­fortunately, you cannot enjoy during your years of medical training the fellowship of men and women training in the humanities. Such students would benefit from your influence, and you would extract from this association imponderable social and cul­tural values. Lacking this, beware the ease by which you may become a mere technician of medi­cal science, rather than a cultured, spiritually minded member of the healing art.

Two other significant changes have occurred during the past century which bear directly upon medicine. First, our industrial age, with all its scientific development, including medicine, has had a profound effect upon the religious life of pro­fessed Christians. Science and technology have in a large measure taken the place of God in the lives of millions. Dr. D. Elton Trueblood, of Stanford, calls it "power culture." It is based upon the as­sumption "that civilization consists primarily in scientific, technical, and artistic achievements, and that it can reach its goal without ethical considerations."

Hitler and Mussolini carried this doctrine to its ultimate. The Western powers won the war, so they are not yet disillusioned. Neverthe­less, the achievement of nuclear physics, with all that it implies is filling men's hearts with fear as they contemplate the possibilities of the future. 

Such mental distress can but produce physical symptoms. Here medicine enters the picture.

This brings us to the second significant change —a long-overdue acknowledgment by medicine in recent years that mental factors, including things spiritual, are vital considerations in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. Unfortunately, there is still much froth in the field of psychotherapy, but medicine appears to be moving unmistakably into that middle zone, where it can be a unifying force in this troubled world.

At such a time as this, you are training in the College of Medical Evangelists, an institution the existence of which is amply justified if its idealism is fulfilled. The changing world and medical science have conspired to magnify the nobility and sacredness of medicine. The ground whereon you stand is holy.

1 David Ramsay, Eulogium on Benjamin Rush (Phila­delphia: Bradford and Inskeep, 1813), p. 23.

2 Benjamin Rush, "Lectures on the Practice of Physic" (1796), I, No. 31 ; II, No. i (MSS, library of University of Pennsylvania) ; cited by Richard H. Shryock, The Development of Modern Medicine (Philadelphia : Uni­versity of Pennsylvania Press, 1936), p, i.

3 J. C. Lettsom, Recollections of Dr. Rush (London: J. Nichols Sons and Bentley, '815), pp. 12, 15.

4 Elisha Bartlett, An Essay on the Philosophy of Medical Science (Philadelphia : Lea and Blanchard, 1844), p. 225.

5 For a critical estimate of Dr. Rush's place in medi­cine see Shyrock, op. cit., pp. 1-3.

6 Clark-Kennedy's small booklet is well worth the time of any medical student or physician: The Art of Medicine in Relation to the Progress of Thought, (New York: Macmillan Company, 1945).

7 The Predicament of Modern Man, (New York Harper and Brothers, 1944).

Advertisement - Ministry in Motion 300x250

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By WILLIAM F. NORWOOD, Ph.D., Dean, Los Angeles Division, CM.E

July 1946

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Remember: There Is Always a Man

The distribution of responsibility is the test of good leadership.

World's Penchant for Peace

A look at recent world trends.

Work Among African Natives

The challenge of a world task.

Evangelism in Wartime Tokyo

A report from Japan.

Preaching Through Translators

Sometimes it is necessary for missionaries and those who are visiting our overseas di­visions to preach through the medium of transla­tors.

Determining Factors in Our Broadcasting

From a chapel talk at the Theological Seminary.

God's Part in Securing Decisions

What is God's part? What is ours?

"Breaking Into Print"

Advice for getting published.

Omissions in New Revised Standard Version

The most perplexing aspect of the Revised Standard Version of the New Testament pub­lished in February, 1946, is the fact that the revisers have whittled down the sacred text.

Movable Letter Illuminated Sign

Efficient Evangelistic Methods and Pastoral Technique.

Correspondence Bible School, Africa

It is increasingly evident that the correspondence method of teaching the Bible is becoming one of the most effective means for soul winning.

Revivals in Small Churches

I believe the first prerequisite for a success­ful effort in either a small church or a large church is the right relationship of oneself with God.

Church Bulletin for Evangelistic Service

Too many times our methods of evangelism do not measure up to the message we bear.

Stand Fast . . . Therefore."

Health reform is an essential accompaniment of our message for today, and we shall, in a moment, see the reason why.

Dietitians as Teachers of Nutrition

It would be an ideal arrangement for many of our larger conferences to employ at least one specially trained food worker, who could devote her entire time to health promotion exclusively along the lines of food and nutrition.

Get Your Food Firsthand

Substance of health talk in an evangelistic series of meetings.

The Gospel Song in History

The monthly music of the message column.

Six Types in Every Audience

The majority of our hearers are just plain, average folk. But in every audience there are certain variant types that need to be recognized and provided for, without overemphasis.

Editorial Postscripts

From the Ministry back page.

Editorial Keynotes

Out of Step in the March of Mankind

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated


Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - Digital Discipleship (160x600)