Who Gets to Go?

This challenging article of Dr. Jacob Janzen's "Who Gets to Go?" was written primarily for the alumni of the College of Medical Evangelists (CME Alumni Journal, May, 1958), but as you read you will find it also has a message and emphasis for ministers and church administrators.

JACOB JANZEN, M.D., President, College of Medical Evangelists Alumni Association

The problem of missionary physician recruitment must be the concern of all of us. Deep study, much prayer, and per­sonal visitation is necessary to meet the call of world medical needs. May God enable us to find men dedicated wholly to the body of the work as well as to the right arm of the mes­sage.—Editors.

One of our workers at the alumni office fired the imagination of her non-Ad­ventist brother by telling him of the opportunities for for­eign medical mission service and adding that only one of every ten doctors graduating from CME was being sent out. "Who gets to go?" was his eager question. She did not have the heart to tell him there is an actual shortage of available doctors among us alumni.

In the January-February, 1958, number of the Medical Service Exchange, Dr. The­odore R. Flaiz, '38, medical secretary of the General Conference, listed twenty foreign medical calls. Most of these were more than twelve months old.

If we add to this year the time of study and deliberation in the field prior to place­ment of the call, the additional time con­sumed in processing the call, the search for a doctor, negotiations with him, physical examinations and immunizations of him and his family, liquidation of his practice, visa, travel, foreign medical board exami­nations and possible language study, we can readily see how another one to two years could slip by before the opening would be filled.

While most of the calls are placed well in advance of their actual openings, yet field administrators tax their ingenuity to satisfy the local needs during the waiting period. Many times the mission doctor is persuaded to stay on past his due furlough time, or else the institution is crippled for lack of replacement. As was explained, this time could easily mount to two years.

What are some of the reasons for such shortage and delay?

Someone has aptly said that "a church without foreign missions is a church with­out a mission." We belong to a church with an aggressive, dynamic foreign-mission pro­gram including numerous medical mission stations and hospitals. Has their number increased out of proportion to the number of students graduating annually from our CME School of Medicine? Hardly. We, the alumni, students, and faculty of the CME, cannot shrug this off as being of con­cern mostly to the field and the Mission Board—it is equally our concern, for it is the avowed purpose of the CME to meet the medical needs of the sponsoring church organization.

The problem is perhaps more complex than one standing on the sidelines can fully visualize. But I feel reluctant to be­lieve that it needs to continue, long defy­ing adequate solution. As one who has been in medical mission service on two continents and who through the years has been interested in this subject of recruit­ment, I shall mention some of the reasons for our failure and offer some suggestions for remedy.

Reasons for Difficulty

A. The Caller (Denomination)

  1. Lack of sufficient and reliable in­formation about conditions, needs, opportunities in field originating the call
  2. Lack of adequate information re­garding prospective candidate
  3. Problems in transmission of call due to lack of specificity, poor tim­ing, random choosing

B. The Called (M.D.)

  1. Financial indebtedness upon grad­uation and other obligations and investments
  2. Sinking roots in medical practice
  3. Family ties and needs
  4. Personal comforts, social and med­ical contacts, avoidance of hard­ships, fear of the unknown

In the afternoon of July 1, 1931, in Los Angeles, intern A was called from the examining room of Part III of the National Board and asked by a visiting clergyman from the General Conference if he would consider a call to Africa. Intern A had on the previous day expressed his desire to Dr. Percy T. Magan to go to a certain country of the Far East where he knew one of the languages and for which field he had qui­etly been preparing himself. But Africa? He had only foggy ideas about that con­tinent. And what about the C medical mis­sion station? Well, the visitor knew noth­ing about it, but intern B, a fellow exam­inee who had once been in Africa, had a vague recollection of passing through that station, remembered particularly that there was "lots of sand, rocks, thorn bushes, and natives."

With that much information the visitor urged intern A to accept this call and to inform him so before sunrise of the follow­ing day when his train was taking him back to Washington, D.C. A three-minute, long-distance telephone call to the intern's wife sufficed to persuade her. By July 19 they had confirmation of the call, and two days later the young couple was on its way to the mission field.

In the British Isles the new missionary passed the qualifying medical examina­tions in record time but then found that the field was not ready for him. For many weeks there was no entry permit. When finally he reached the field, his destination had been changed successively from C medical mission to three others, for which he and his wife had no preparation what­soever.

They made the most of things under dif­ficult circumstances, but in a few short years they, disheartened and dejected, re­turned for reasons of poor health.

This brief, true account illustrates a number of points under consideration. True, there was speedy action and ready acceptance of a specific call. But what of the information regarding the field and the appointee and the latter's lack of physical and psychological preparation?

Suggested Remedy

I am sure that the secretaries of the Gen­eral Conference put forth a great deal of effort to find out about the field and the prospective appointee before they make their contacts. But much more needs to be done to attract larger numbers of our CME graduates and to choose the right sort of persons for mission service. Ideally, each appointee should be tailor-made for a speci­fic assignment. This could be partially achieved in the following manner:

Each field where the station is located could prepare a prospectus, depicting, in word and film, conditions (climatic, poli­tical, religious), needs and opportunities (economic, medical), and sundry activi­ties,and submit it for editing to the res­pective Division of the General Confer­ence, which would pass it on to the central office in Washington, D.C., for use of the Foreign Missions Committee. Such infor­mation could then be dispensed to poten­tial candidates or to interested inquirers or study groups.

Each Division Medical Secretary knows his personnel, their furlough due dates, re­placement needs, and new openings. Each field committee knows its budget capacity. Periodic lists of current and prospective openings could be announced in the CME publications or the Journal.

Among the students and faculty of the CME, groups could be formed which would study medical missions, selecting certain areas, even a specific hospital or station. They could gather all possible in­formation from the prospectus, periodic list, visiting returned missionary, and other sources and thus in a sense become special­ists on the subject. The work of Dr. Ralph F. Waddell, '36, has been an inspiration to many. While yet a student at CME he chose Thailand, studied about it, and prepared himself for service to its people. It is com­mon knowledge how from practically noth­ing he led in building up an extensive medical work which is highly thought of by the Thai people, the government, and visitors from abroad. Directiveness in our thinking and endeavor is important.

CME Working on Plan

Dr. John E. Peterson, '39, assistant dean of the School of Medicine, is working on a plan to enable selected medical students to spend a portion of their summer vacation assisting with the work in some of our near­est foreign mission hospitals. No doubt their reports will spark foreign mission in­terest among our students.

Careful selection of students reduces failures, and CME cautiously screens en­tering students, starting with their premed­ical years. The Dean of Students from CME carefully watches and repeatedly confers with them, and the colleges render impar­tial reports. The percentage of error and failure is reduced to a minimum.

Information regarding an individual student is additive in the dean's and regis­trar's office, and could readily form the nucleus for a dossier to which further data could be added even after graduation. A special standing committee could be formed with representation from the fac­ulty, students, and alumni, which as the Medical Recruitment Committee as a screening agency could render valuable as­sistance to the General Conference Mis­sions Committee.

While an occasional unforeseen need may arise, most calls should not have to be made on an emergency basis; doing so re­veals poor planning and timing. Short-term appointments can be specially arranged for, but long-term appointees should not be unsettled by aimless shifting hither and yon. Even in foreign countries it takes time to build up a following in practice. The usual policy of allowing a person only a certain number of years in a given place should not be applied to doc­tors. We have one alumnus, Dr. Roy B. Parsons, '29, who has never been shifted because replacement was impossible, and he has been outstandingly successful.

Sometimes an urgent call will be passed on almost simultaneously to several per­sons. General calls hold little appeal. A man must sense the appeal of a specific need in order to respond heartily.

Failure Is Traumatic

The fact that a man holds an M.D. de­gree does not necessarily qualify him to become surgeon and administrator of a hospital. Failure is a traumatic experience for him and an expensive one for the field. Also, if the man has been a social misfit in the homeland, in all probability he will not establish good rapport in a foreign setting. None of the best among us is too good to become a successful foreign medical missionary; for it takes talent, ingenuity, wis­dom, endurance, and patient perseverance.

The General Conference has a deferred appointment plan which pays a chosen student his last two years' tuition on condi­tion that he does not obligate himself otherwise. During these years a student can earn very little on the side or during an almost non-existent summer vacation, so to become eligible for the deferred ap­pointment, a poor worthy student needs further financial assistance to meet his liv­ing costs. An Alumni Medical Missionary Bursary Plan could be evolved to provide such supplementary financial assistance, thus enabling certain students to respond to calls for foreign mission service. As the bursary fund grows, it could help a young graduate to liquidate private indebtedness on a prorated annual basis for each year of foreign service. This could equally apply to a resident who with his family has struggled through a long siege of a specialty training program.

M.D. Versus Minister

For the man already established in prac­tice, a call poses still other difficulties. He may have succeeded in paying off his school debts, but he also has found it necessary to invest heavily in home, office, and equip­ment. Such investments are not always easy to liquidate without considerable loss. It is certainly more difficult to pull up roots from an established practice than to go into mission service direct after completion of internship or residency, provided the ap­pointees in the latter category receive the necessary financial assistance.

The situation of a medical appointee to a foreign mission assignment is different from that of a ministerial appointee. For a minister, a call to foreign mission service is more in the nature of a transfer to an­other post within the employing organi­zation. Upon return to the homeland he almost automatically receives another as­signment, and upon retirement can expect sustentation from the denomination and social security from the government.

The doctor, on the other hand, has to liquidate a practice, perhaps dissolve a part­nership. Protracted negotiation has a dele­terious effect on his practice. Returning home he may not find employment in the organization. It takes time to build back his practice. There are other specific classi­fications which might be illustrated by the example of a physician I heard of recently. After having served eighteen years in for­eign mission fields, he came home for health reasons. Unless he can resume work for the denomination within five years, he for­feits his sustentation credit. As there are few posts for physicians in the organized work in the U.S.A., and the health reasons will probably not allow him to serve over­seas again, he must start at the bottom in private practice. He is not eligible for so­cial security, nor can he take on any in­surance program which will care for him when he must retire. He would be willing to pay into the sustentation fund, but that is apparently against the policy. This sort of thing could hardly happen to a minister. Generally speaking one might sum up that the minister is in it for life, while the physi­cian only for the duration of a specific as­signment.

Another reason for finding fewer medi­cal appointees as compared to ministerial is due to the inequality in expense and duration of preparation. A physician has spent four to eight more years in costly study preparing for a foreign mission ap­pointment. Perhaps the mission organiza­tion should take more cognizance of this in assisting medical appointees in their financial struggle.

Who Among Us?

There are many giants blocking the way. If one stops to consider the sacrifices he has to make, the hardships he has to over­come, and some of the inequalities men­tioned, he will turn to the comfort and freedom of his private practice, leaving the burden of the call, perhaps to someone with less fitness and preparation. Foreign mission service is not for the fainthearted. If one considers the matchless love so well illustrated by the magnitude of Christ's sac­rifice, and when one allows that love to flow through his own life, a call to service of needy mankind in a distant land be­comes a challenge, a privilege, and an ad­venture for God. Who among us will ex­perience the thrill and satisfaction of such service?


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

JACOB JANZEN, M.D., President, College of Medical Evangelists Alumni Association

January 1959

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Ambassadors of Freedom

Is it possible that the priceless free­doms of the nineteenth and twentieth cen­turies have died or are dying out of the hearts of a race that has so marvelously benefited by them?

Science and Religious Faith—Part I

Dr. Marsh gave a series of three chapel talks during the first half of the summer session of 1958 at Potomac Uni­versity. The students at the university wished to have them in some permanent form, and it was felt that our workers in the field would also appreciate them. Therefore, rather than being mimeographed for a limited group, they are being made available through THE MINISTRY. This is the first of six articles that will bring this series to our readers.—Editors

Ideas on the Atonement Contrasted

This and the concluding article next month were presented first at the Theological Seminary and subsequently before several groups of ministers, and is being published in response to many urgent requests.—Editors.

Where Shall the Minister Locate?

Dealing with the issue of ministerial housing problems.

A Life Well Spent

This is the first time we have published a service of this kind in the columns of this journal. However, Charles S. Longacre was so well known to our workers around the world that we felt we could well share this with our readers. This service was in many ways a model of sympathy, dignity, and beauty. Among those who took part in this service were C. J. Coon, retired president of the Potomac Conference, who read the obituary; R. R. Figuhr, General Conference president, who preached the sermon; and J. A. Buckwalter, secretary of the General Conference Religious Liberty Association, who offered the prayer.—Editors

Where Do We Find Our Bible Instructors?

A Bible instructor is the first base for guid­ing new recruits into the profession.

Missionary Contacts at Washington Sanitarium

NOTE.—Seventh-day Adventist health institutions have been raised up by divine instruction. Their purpose is to proclaim the message of God's saving grace while using the treatment of diseases as an "entering wedge." Health reform is the "right arm" of the message. We herewith publish a section of the chaplain's report presented at a recent biennial session. In a very practical way this report reveals the wonderful providences in the sanitariums' mission. God's challenge to all who work in these God-appointed health institutions is to meet His purpose for their existence.—EDITORS

When Did Satan's Fall Occur?

Did Sa­tan's apostasy and expulsion from heaven take place before our world was created?

Who Put You In?

Who put you in? There is all the difference in the world between being "istalled" and being "called."

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)