The Middle East--Cradle of Strife!

Ever since Noah's ark docked somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat, the leading na­tions of the world have managed to focus their sights on that ge­ographical area that is today commonly referred to as the Middle East.

CHARLES B. HIRSCH, Ph.D., Professor of History. Washington Missionary College and Potomac University

Ever since Noah's ark docked somewhere in the vicinity of Mount Ararat, the leading na­tions of the world have managed to focus their sights on that ge­ographical area that is today commonly referred to as the Middle East. The attention be­stowed has at different times varied in ratio to the pressing exigencies of the period. Inter­mittently, however, this area throughout the centuries has found itself the center of inter­national intrigue, unrest, and strife. Its begin­ning followed the great Deluge, when it served as the womb of our present conglomeration of races and nations.

A student of the Scriptures recognizes that here was the setting for the events of Biblical history. The tower of Babel, the Exodus from Egypt, the Babylonian captivity, and the Ten Commandments are a few of the high lights of this ancient desert land, where such personali­ties as Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Darius, Nebu­chadnezzar, Solomon, and David were to con­tribute in such a positive way to the historical record of the time. Early evidence of the fer­ment that was to characterize the chain of events among these peoples was the activities of the Sumerians, the Hittites, the Philistines, the Babylonians, and the Medes and Persians. Behind the ferment were two pressing factors: first, this "land of the two rivers" contained the crossroads of trade and commerce, and second, the most productive soil of the region was lo­cated in the more encompassing Fertile Cres­cent. These were two very good reasons why the neighboring kingdoms were so willing to risk bloodshed and life for the control of this land and its peoples.

Of all these nations, tribes, and kingdoms that left an indelible record of their deeds for posterity, the most lasting contribution was made in the field of literature, by a group of people who probably suffered more than any other of their time, the Jews. Their contribu­tion? The Old Testament of the Bible! It was in this record that the first of the world's three greatest religions—Judaism, symbolized by the star—was to be preserved for posterity. And from Judaism there was to arise a new religion —Christianity, symbolized by the cross.

When Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was ful­filling the prophecies of Isaiah in the early part of the first century, the lands of the Middle East, where He had spent most of the days of His earthly life, had been once again subdued. This conquest was accomplished by the greatest empire in the history of the then contemporary world—Rome. Where once, under the aegis of Alexander the Great, the Hellenistic civiliza­tion had reigned supreme, the shield of the Roman now was to protect peace—peace in a land where tumult was the rule instead of the exception. And in peace, through the work of Peter, Paul, and the other apostles, the new re­ligion began to gain converts. Within the next few centuries Christianity spread rapidly, un­dergoing severe persecutions but managing fi­nally, with some alterations, to become the chief religion of the Western world. The influence of Christ's followers within the desert lands was limited, and in the seventh century it was fur­ther kept in check when the third of the world's greatest religions to come from the cradle of civilization—Mohammedanism, symbolized by the crescent—appeared on the world horizon.

With Mohammed and his followers Islam was not only a source of religious nourishment but also was to become a way of life, politically and economically. So much did the material aspects of this religion appeal to the people that in a short time it spread with the speed of fire through an arid forest. Soon it not only en­gulfed the countries of the Middle East but blazed its way through Northern Africa, through Spain, and as far as the vicinity of the Loire River, where it was checked by the French under the leadership of Charles Martel. During this rampage the slaughter of mankind reached new proportions, and again the land of the Tigris and Euphrates was experiencing the shedding of blood.

In the meantime, while Islam was asserting herself as supreme, her kin by jus soli as well as jus sanguinis, Christianity, was moving to a similar position in the West. Soon these two forces were to challenge each other on the field of battle in the land of their birth. The Chris­tians were striving to wrest the control of Jeru­salem from the infidels. Thousands upon thou­sands were to march or ride into the fray. Fewer were to return. As the ramparts of the Saracens held fast, the efforts of numerous crusades were eventually to meet with failure. Human blood again contributed to the fertility of the soil of the Middle East. By the fourteenth century, when the Ottoman Empire was in the ascend­ancy, the Moslem hordes were penetrating the Balkan Peninsula, and with the fall of Con­stantinople in 1453 they continued westward through the underbelly of Europe until they were knocking at the gates of Vienna. Here, through the determined efforts of John Sobieski, king of Poland, they were forced to about-face and find their way back to the land of their origin.

Sobieski's victory in 1683 was to open a new chapter in the history of the Middle East. Where previously the Turks and Mohammed­ans had played the offensive against the West­ern powers, the latter, after shaking off the bar­nacles of feudalism and developing into strong nation states, now challenged the grip of the Middle East power. Russia, the last to throw off the vestiges of feudalism, and Austria were among the most covetous at this time. The former was anxious for a warm-water seaport, while the land of the Hapsburgs was looking to the Balkans as an area for expansion. This inter­est resolved itself into what became known as the "Eastern Question," namely, the efforts of the European powers to retard and halt Rus­sia's inroads into the Ottoman lands.

With the outbreak of the French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon, the Moslems had a temporary respite from Russian and Austrian attention. The French, led by the "Little Cor­poral" aimed at cutting British communications with India by invading Egypt. Napoleon's troops did advance as far as Palestine, Syria, and Lebanon, but the British proved to be the victors. There were also two other positive results of this French venture. One was the discovery of the Rosetta stone in 1799, which was helpful in unraveling many of the mysteries of the past, and the other was to awaken the British to the strategic importance of the Middle East to British expanding interests. The web of the Middle East intrigue was now attracting the leading powers in world affairs, and as a result, the Ottoman Empire was slowly beginning to disintegrate.

In the middle of the nineteenth century the Czar of Russia was to refer to this empire as the "sick man of Europe," with the hope of sharing in the will before its death. The Otto­man rule, with pressure on the outside from the European states and internal pressures due to corruption and nationalistic feelings, was find­ing it difficult to keep control of the reins of empire. It was only the fear of the Western European powers that the area might fall under the control of the Russians that enabled Tur­key to continue its existence on crutches.

Other parts of the Middle East, too, were be­ginning to notice the growing interest of foreign powers in Southwestern Asia. The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 heightened the in­creased French and British surveillance. The German's Drang nach Osten policy had positive goals in the southern end of the proposed Berlin to Baghdad railway. World War I was to climax the growing tensions.

The world crisis that followed the assassina­tion of the Austrian heir to the throne in the Balkans did not exclude the eastern end of the Mediterranean. Vested interests, especially in regard to oil fields, had already been established, and the powers of the Triple Alliance and the Triple Entente merely extended their range of activities in the Middle East. The fact that the peoples of the Middle East were at odds with one another, politically and religiously, merely added to the existing instability. Again conditions seemed normal. Strife was in the land!

When the final shots subsided and the treaties were signed, the Moslems found themselves experiencing a military occupation under the British and the French. Adding more fuel to the fires of the already troubled Middle East were the claims of the Zionists, which were becoming increasingly vociferous. These factors, among others, aided the nationalistic aspirations of the desert countries during the years between the two world wars. When World War II raised its ugly head over the horizon, the Arabic na­tions, though inclined toward the Axis powers, experienced little bloodshed because of the strong military influence of the allies in that area. The fighting that did occur was relegated to the peripheral sections of Egypt and Libya. The years following witnessed the emancipa­tion of the Moslem countries and in addition the founding of a new nation—Israel. This was a situation that was to further incite the antag­onisms of Middle East politics and intrigue for the years ahead.

It should be noted at this point that the state of Israel today does not include from inside its borders many of the holy places of Old Testa­ment times. A graphic illustration of this is readily available by comparing a map of Pales­tine found in most Bibles with a map of what is politically defined as Israel today. Many of the places that mean so much to Jewish heritage and tradition are controlled by the Moslems—the arch foes of the Jews. Ironically, some places that might be considered holy places within the confines of this modern state of Israel do not have much significance to the Jews. One such place is Nazareth. Another is the Sea of Galilee. These are connected with Jesus Christ and the Christian message.

One might pause here to ponder what Abra­ham's thoughts rnight have been had he been able to foresee the future of his children's chil­dren. Through his two sons, Ishmael and Isaac, his seed was to multiply beyond count. Through Ishmael the Arabic peoples came to inhabit the sands of the desert, and through Isaac the Jews were to be scattered to the four ends of the globe. If man persists and succeeds in finding his way into outer space, the Dias­pora will become more infinite, with the possi­bilities of the return of all the Jews to the land of their origin becoming negligible.

Could Abraham have visualized the ultimate events, including the bloodshed and hatred en­gendered by the actions of his sons' children, might he not have refused to take Hagar as his second wife, through whom Ishmael was born? What might he have been tempted to do on Mount Moriah when his other son, Isaac, was seemingly to be sacrificed on the altar? Fortu­nately for Abraham, and man, the future is re­vealed only as the Creator wills it. The father of the Arabs and the Jews was spared the heart­aches that would certainly have been his had he had the opportunity to look beyond the horizon of his lifetime to the present.

In our contemporary world the "cradle of civilization" intermittently continues to monop­olize the news of the world. There is little devia­tion from its centuries-old pattern. Communica­tion media such as radio, television, and the press find little rest from news of developments in this area. The repeating theme of strife and unrest that has so enshrouded this section of the world continues; but why, of all the geo­graphical and political sections in the world, has this one been so greedy for universal atten­tion? True, the greatest powers in the world today—the United States and her allies, and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and her satellites—have exhibited more than a winking interest in this area because of its wealth in oil and its strategic location. This interest, how­ever, is not much different from that exhibited by the great nations and empires since the early beginnings of our earth's history. Wherein then, we might ask, lies the significance, if any, in this persistent theme of the Middle East's history?

A survey of the Holy Scriptures reveals little in the way of prophetic interpretation regard­ing this bridge that joins three continents. Other than the prophecies concerning the Jews and Palestine, the Bible seems to offer little light. Numerous scholars as well as would-be scholars have attempted to tie the Middle East, or parts of it, to prophecies yet unfulfilled, but these interpretations are only too often based on conjecture, or evidence that is insufficient to support such claims. Ellen G. White in her publications makes mention of Egypt and Ara­bia in their historical settings, but careful study of her writings will reveal no specific reference to the Middle East in the light of prophecy.

It might thus be concluded that whatever Bib­lical light there may be on the matter, it has not yet been fully revealed to man. Nor is this strange, for the real purpose of prophecy is not to make men expert in predicting the future, but as students of the Word to be able to inter­pret the present. Our Lord laid down this prin­ciple when He said, "And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe." Only when prophecy is being fulfilled can we fully understand it. In our search for evidence of divine meaning in the events of our day, certain questions naturally come to mind. Can it be that the Omnipotent has a specific role, perhaps as yet unrevealed, to be played by these people? Could the Jehovah of the Jews, the God of the Christians, and the Allah of the Mohammedans be using the birth­place of these three great religions as a con­stant reminder to the world that He is God and the Saviour of mankind? If so, then there is no part of the world that could serve such a pur­pose as does the Middle East. Some answers are easier to find than others, but through diligent study of the Scriptures in the light of reliable historical records we can arrive at a definitive answer, but then only if the time has come for such a revelation to be made known. We must never forget that our times are still in God's hands.

While this strategic spot will doubtless con­tinue to hold world interest both politically and economically, yet some of the best informed and most thoughtful students of Scripture and his­tory claim that it is impossible to localize this area of the Middle East as the center of final decision on human destiny. Let us study cur­rent events with an open mind and also with a humble and prayerful spirit, "looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ."

Advertisement - RevivalandReformation 300x250

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

CHARLES B. HIRSCH, Ph.D., Professor of History. Washington Missionary College and Potomac University

May 1959

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

"Adorn the Doctrine"

There is no element in the preacher's life that is of more importance than his example.

Convincing Evidences

Just now, forty years and more after Ellen White laid down her pen, new items of clear, confirming evidence of her gift of inspiration are being discovered and presented to the public in an unprecedented manner Newspapers, magazines, and books all around us pile up evidence regarding her veracity.

The Gift That Builds

To read all of Mrs. White's writings will indeed be a major task, but a spiritually profitable one.

Our Minister

Our preacher knew just what to say to soothe the hurt in our hearts and to encourage us to faithfulness in the face of taunts and sneers on the part of our non-Adventist classmates.


Essential Steps to Success in the Ministry-2

A Non-Adventist Leader Examines Our Beliefs

Book reviews on Questions on Doctrine continue to come to our desk.

What Kind of "Voice" Are You?

There is no doubt that John the Baptist was one of the most successful preachers the world has ever known

To "Every Nation . . ." The Divine Command to a Universal Church

A world-embracing task confronts God's people today.

The Evangelical World Prospect: An Interview with Billy Graham

Reprinted by permission, Christianity Today, Oct. 13, 1958

Evangelistic Techniques in Britain

The writer has recently had the privilege of conducting city-wide campaigns in two of Britain's largest cities, Bir­mingham and Manchester.

Planning an Evangelistic Campaign Part II

Revivalism and evangelism should not be confused. Both are indispensable, but they ought to be distinct in method of approach, in purpose, and in the type of sermons presented.

Ideals for Mothers

The monthly shepherdess column.

Socials for the Entire Church

Successful church entertainments can help us reach our goals. A presentation to the Texas Conference Shepherdess Group.

Basic Training for Personal Evangelism

The term "personal worker" requires a new emphasis in an hour when there is true need for this type of worker.

Are You a Breakfast Skipper?

"Eat a Good Breakfast—Start a Good Day."

The Highest Career

Does the spirit of ambition threaten to de­prive some of our workers of the joy that re­sults from humble and faithful work in God's cause?

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - Digital Discipleship (160x600)