Chemically dependent families

This article has been provided by the Health and Temperance Department of the General Conference.

Gunter Reiss is an associate professor of health promotion and education at the School of Health, Loma Linda University, where he is director of the School for Alcohol Problems and teaches alcohol and drug dependency-related courses.

Chemical dependency has been widely documented in literature as a disease process resulting in death unless successful intervention occurs. It has been called a family disease1 because when chemical dependency is present in a family, no family member escapes its deadly results.

Since adolescent chemical dependency is increasing, family treatment may be our best hope for preventing chemical dependency in the next generation. Yet the family's importance in the initiation and maintenance of chemical dependency has generally gone unrecognized or is poorly understood. Although a fully integrated, universally accepted theory of chemically dependent family functioning does not yet exist, the core concepts deserve attention.

The members of a family operate as a system. The family system has been likened to a mobile, a piece of art made up of rods and strings suspending five or six differently sized figures. The beauty of the mobile is found in its balance and movement. When stress is imposed upon the mobile, such as by the push of a hand, the entire system moves interdependently to maintain equilibrium.

The family, likewise, has a strong sense of balance and stability, sometimes called homeostasis. When the family experiences severe stress, as in the case of chemical dependency, all family members move interdependently, initiating and maintaining new roles within the family so that it can survive. These survival roles lead to a predictable pattern of psychopathology in each family member, resulting in codependency.2 Individuals who live or work closely with a chemically dependent person eventually become set in their roles. They regard their roles as absolutely essential for survival. They play them subconsciously with the same denial, delusion, and compulsiveness as the chemically dependent victim plays his role of chemical abuser, regarding the chemical as absolutely essential for his survival. Thus, dependency in the chemically dependent victim and codependency in family members result in similar if not the same dynamics. Changing this situation requires intervention with the whole family.

Those who work with chemically dependent families observe the follow ing survival roles in virtually every family: the victim; the protector, or enabler; the hero, or high achiever; the scapegoat, or problem child; the lost, or forgotten, child; and the mascot, or family pet.3 Unless someone intervenes, these survival roles enable the process of chemical dependency and codependency to continue its fatal course. (In describing these roles, I will use the pronoun he, although any of these roles may be filled by either a male or a female.)

The victim

This is the chemically dependent person who has developed a primary love relationship with the chemical, making all other relationships secondary. The victim is processing two main feelings: anger and fear. He is angry because he believes that significant others in his life do not understand him. The chemicals he uses are not his problem—they are his solution. Why, he wonders, can't people understand that his problems are his spouse, children, or boss?

At the same time, the victim is under constant fear of losing some things he values: his job (which provides the money for his supply of chemicals), his family members (whom he labels as one of his main problems), and his sanity. It is difficult if not impossible to hold on to something that is both a major problem and a highly valued behavior. Strong delusion, no matter how sincere, results in creating chronic, painful emotions of shame, loneliness, and guilt. The victim cannot deal with this overwhelming personal pain, but continues to apply his solution: the chemicals. Without professional help he will thereby continue to travel the maze of addiction unto death.

The protector (enabler)

The protector is usually the person closest to the victim, perhaps a spouse, boyfriend, girlfriend, parent, sibling, employee, or boss. The protector develops the same dynamics as the victim. Just as the victim denies that he has a problem with the chemical, the protector (as well as all other family members) will fiercely deny that chemical dependency is the problem facing the family. This denial is practiced with sincere delusion until it can be practiced no longer.

Also, as the chemically dependent victim becomes more and more addicted to the chemical, the protector becomes increasingly addicted to the unpredictable behavior and mood swings of the chemically dependent victim, which in time dominate the life of the protector entirely. Eventually the protector can not live with or without the chemically dependent victim any more than the victim can live with or without his chemical. These are the true markings of addiction.

By desperately attempting to protect the family from the tidal waves of the chemical dependency, the protector will be the main one responsible for enabling the illness to run its full course, and even hastening it along. By making excuses to the boss—for example, telling him that the victim has the flu (i.e., hang over)—the protector shields the chemically dependent victim from being fired; by taking over the finances, looking after the yard, car, house repairs, and children, the protector shields the victim from the sharing of responsibilities and from feelings of guilt. These protecting acts make up the protector's survival role, which, completely unknown to him, becomes an addiction in itself, making it possible for the chemically dependent" victim to go on using his chemicals. Although the protector is motivated by love, his predominant feeling is anger at self and others for not being able to control the ongoing crises caused by the chemical dependency.

The hero (high achiever)

The hero is usually the firstborn child. Often the hero and the protector work in close alliance to maintain family equilibrium in the face of crisis. Quite soon the hero assesses what the rules of the family are and adheres to them. This rewards him with positive strokes, and he is entrusted by the family system with the task of finding solutions to the ongoing crises. Early on he is greatly praised and told how proud his family is of his achievement at home, school, and work. He determines to become a successful achiever, giving pride and relief to the family system and effectively distracting them from the real problem: chemical dependency. This enables chemical dependency to continue its downward spiral.

In spite of appearing well adjusted on the outside, the hero experiences chronic feelings of guilt, inadequacy, and loneliness. Coming up with answers to the ongoing problems created by the family illness is a lonely and impossible job.

The scapegoat (problem child)

The scapegoat is usually the second-born child. Like the hero, the scapegoat attempts to follow the rules of the family system. He learns very quickly, however, that he is unable to compete with the hero, who has a strong alliance with the protector and is regarded by the family as an all-around good guy, highly successful in what he does. Thus, the first thing the scapegoat learns is to resent the hero for "getting there first." This produces feelings of guilt, for he is taught that he should love his siblings.

Because of his inability to compete for needed positive strokes and attention from family members, the scapegoat eventually learns to get attention by breaking family rules. He hides under the bed or in the attic, runs away, or gets into drugs and/or early sexual activity. He becomes the problem child.

This survival role gives a kind of relief to the family. A scapegoat has been identified. He can be blamed instead of the true source of the problem—the chemical dependency that no one .in the family is able to solve.

Emotionally, like the rest of the family members, the scapegoat experiences a lot of anger and hurt. He is hurt and angry because his efforts to gain attention do not result in acceptance within his own family, and he ultimately withdraws. The family members feel angry and hurt because they interpret the scapegoat's behavior as disloyalty. They blame the scapegoat for much if not most of the family problems.

The lost child (forgotten child)

As did the scapegoat, the lost child (usually the third-born) learns quickly that he is not as important as the chemically dependent victim and the hero, who use up most of the available attention. While the scapegoat becomes the focus of the family through destructive behavior, and the hero manages to find his place in the family through compliant behavior, the lost child finds it easier to become a loner. He withdraws from the family through excessive read ing, watching TV, listening to music, and living in a fantasy world.

Increasingly, the lost child opts to live in a world of his own creation. The family finds this behavior not only acceptable but a relief. This survival role frees the family from having to worry about him. As a matter of fact, the family system seems to operate more efficiently without interacting much with the lost child, and the feelings of unimportance and low self-worth hit hard. Although outwardly the lost child appears self-reliant, feelings of loneliness and confusion are deeply rooted. Confusion exists because of the lost child's inability to distinguish clearly between the reality of chemical dependency and codependency and his private world of fantasy.

The mascot (family pet)

By the time the mascot (usually the youngest child) arrives on the family scene, the psychopathology displayed covertly and overtly within the family system requires fast and drastic actions, and the mascot will do almost anything to secure attention. He becomes a family clown. He learns to perform well. Using humor, telling jokes, playing the con artist, he learns to survive by gaining attention and producing much laughter in the family, once again distracting the rest from the real family problem, and producing welcome temporary relief. Thus, like other survival roles, the role of the mascot enables chemical dependency to continue its work of destruction. Viewed superficially, the mascot is a witty, lighthearted entertainer. His predominant emotion, however, is the chronic fear of not having a meaningful place in the family unless he continues to be the center of attention.

In this brief sketch of the dynamics of chemical dependency, it becomes clear that these survival roles, psychopathological as they may be, are unconsciously learned and maintained so well that they will be played throughout the lives of the family members. There is no healthful way to adapt to chemical dependency, regardless of the quality or quantity of roles played within the chemically dependent family system. Total family intervention on the spiritual, emo tional, social, and physical level is the only realistic hope for dealing with chemical dependency. Pastors may play the important role of helping these families see chemical dependency for what it really is so that they will seek professional help.

1 P. Steinglass, "Assessing Families in Their
Own Homes," American Journal of Psychiatry 137,
No. 12 (1980): 15234529; P. Steinglass, "A Life
History Model of the Alcoholic Family," Family
Process 19, No. 3 (1980): 211-226; N. J. Estes,
"Counseling the Wife of an Alcoholic Spouse," in
N. J. Estes and M. E. Heinemann, eds., Alcoholism:
Development, Consequences, and Interventions
(St. Louis: C. V. MosbyCo., 1977).

2 S. Wegscheider, Another Chance: Hope and
Health for Alcoholic Families (Palo Alto, Calif.:
Science and Behavior Books, 1980).

3 Ibid.; and V. Satir, Peoplemaldng (Palo Alto,
Calif.: Science and Behavior Books, 1972).

Advertisement - Digital Discipleship (300x250)

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus
Gunter Reiss is an associate professor of health promotion and education at the School of Health, Loma Linda University, where he is director of the School for Alcohol Problems and teaches alcohol and drug dependency-related courses.

May 1987

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

The call--her side of the story

When she's got a good job and then her husband receives a call that would require moving, what's a minister's wife to do?

Finding fulfillment

Must you have your own career to be fulfilled? This study will help you know and accept yourself.

Loneliness in the parsonage

Are you lonely? What makes you so? What can you do about it?

Creative congregational singing

Hymn singing can be exciting! The vibrant sound of joyful songs of praise does something great for the spirit of the church.

Internal control

How to save your church from a financial scandal.

A dream that started as a nightmare

Overwhelmed by people's needs for counseling or personal support? Relief may be as close as your own church.

Proposal for peace and understanding

"Relations between our two countries are continuing to deteriorate, the arms race is intensifying, and the war threat is not subsiding.... Surely, God on high has not refused to give us enough wisdom to find ways to bring us an improvement in our relations."-General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev, Time, Vol. 126, No. 10, Sept. 9, 1985, pp. 22-29

Modems and ministry

Computer Corner

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Trending

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - NAD Stewardship (160x600)