What's Good About the Good News?

Can we declare to all men that Christ's sacrifice effectively redeems them?

Reviewed by Robert J. Wieland, Seventh-day Adventist pastor, author, and former missionary to Africa.

Can we declare to all men that Christ's sacrifice effectively redeems them? The Calvinist must say no; Christ has actually saved only the elect. The Arminian must also say no; Christ has only made a pro vision whereby all men could be effectively saved if they do something right, that is, believe or accept Him.

The bad news that inevitably spoils this "good news" is that the sinner can never be really sure he is one of Calvinism's effectively saved "elect." Neither can the sinner be sure that he has believed or accepted the gospel properly enough so that Arminianism's provisional salvation is effective for him. If he doesn't respond properly, Christ's sacrifice remains a mere provision that accomplishes nothing.

According to Punt, ever since the third century the Christian church has imbibed a simple but false assumption. Punt labels it Premise A--"All persons are lost, on the road to hell, except those whom the Bible says will be saved." Calvinism refines this assumption by identifying the exceptions as the elect; Arminianism refines it by identifying them as those who do something--believe. Punt suggests that this basic assumption is nonbiblical.

Punt says the good news is that all per sons are saved by the sacrifice of Christ and will go to heaven, the only exception being those whom the Bible specifically says will be finally lost. In other words, Christ actually accomplished salvation for all men, except those who personally, finally (persistently), willfully, choose not to have God in their knowledge. Punt claims that both Calvinists and Arminians have missed this focal point of the true New Testament good news.

This good news premise blows through Punt's pages like a fresh wind that almost takes one's breath away. The biblical evidence he marshals is impressive, and strongly suggests that the apostles turned their world upside down with a gospel that contained considerably better good news than our versions of it convey to day.

Consider, for example, that troublesome passage in Romans 5:18 that has kept theologians at sword's point for centuries: "As one man's trespass led to condemnation for all men, so one man's act of righteousness leads to acquittal and life for all men" (RSV).

Simply stated, this text can be under stood in four ways:

1. Calvinism says that this means that Christ's "act of righteousness" is effective only for "all the elect."

2. Arminianism says this text reveals that salvation is only "provided for all persons"; its effectiveness is contingent entirely on the response of the sinner.

3. Universalism says that Paul's words mean that "all persons" will be saved at last.

4. Punt believes that Paul's words mean that there is indeed an effective and accomplished "acquittal and life for all men" (see 1 John 2:2; 2 Cor. 5:19), with the exception only of those whom the Bible (in its broader context) declares will not be saved. Scripture excludes from salvation only those, who, in addition to their sin "in Adam," willfully and finally reject or remain indifferent toward whatever revelation of Himself God has given to them.

The Bible reveals no final or contributing cause of salvation other than God's initiative of grace. Likewise, there is no final or contributing cause of condemnation other than man's rejection of God's grace. We will never comprehend this placing side by side of God's sovereignty and man's responsibility. We accept both simply because both are revealed in the Scriptures.

A wholehearted acceptance of Punt's premise would revolutionize evangelism and make the message so palatable that multitudes who now shrug their shoulders at Christianity would begin to see in it what the ancients saw when the apostles enlightened the world. Perhaps this salient recovery of a long-neglected New Testament truth will be effective. If we are willing to believe this good news, our missionary outreach to the world will feel its impact.

Here is a book that will challenge keen theologians; but it is so clearly and simply written that it will also warm the hearts of lay readers. That too is very good news.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus
Reviewed by Robert J. Wieland, Seventh-day Adventist pastor, author, and former missionary to Africa.

July 1989

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

How are you keeping your appointments with God?

Is God as important as the Rotary Club? Do we dare treat our appointments with Him with less respect?

The single Christian and artificial insemination

Should a single woman who wants a family consider artificial insemination? What counsel would you give her?

Porn's pitfalls

You can join the fight without being tainted yourself.

Back from oblivion

What does an abused woman need from you, her pastor?

My Creationist-Separationist Dilemma

How do you reconcile a public school system, a separationist view of church and state, and creationism?

You can always pray!

Do the competency and involvement of other ministers' wives in their husbands' churches make you feel inadequate?

The stewardship of power

Are you using the power God has given you in His way, or in the human way?

How to handle headache

This article is provided by the Health and Temperance Department of the General Conference.

The life of prayer

Book of Note regarding the life of prayer.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)