Christ's "Other Sheep "

Will you explain how certain mark­edly spiritual leaders and writers, such as Moody and Murray, who never accepted this message though they knew of its existence, have done such wonderful service for God and give evidence of clear acceptance and fel­lowship with Christ?

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

Will you explain how certain mark­edly spiritual leaders and writers, such as Moody and Murray, who never accepted this message though they knew of its existence, have done such wonderful service for God and give evidence of clear acceptance and fel­lowship with Christ?

Any answer offered must at best be only suggestive, for only God holds the knowledge of all the facts and factors. He alone " knoweth them that are His." 2 Tim. 2:19. But perhaps the following may aid in answering this natural and legitimate inquiry:

That Christ has " other sheep " which are " not of this fold," is His own plain declaration in John 10: 16. This principle has been operative through the ages, including this last generation. Again, and in the very phraseology of the advent message, God denominates some as " My peo­ple," who are still in the churches des­ignated as " Babylon." Collectively " fallen," it is evident that individuals are owned by Him in other com­munions. Naturally, as time goes on, the separating process will progress until when probation closes these will have been gathered out, and there will be but " one fold, and one Shepherd."

Second, we do not know the nature of the contacts made by these individ­uals with this message through its local representatives. They may have been such as did not give a true pic­ture of God's designed truth. Perhaps they saw only caricatures instead. From the first, God designed this movement to be the climax of all spir­itual and doctrinal truth. Founded by men coming from various commun­ions, it was a struggle toward the light. It was a gradual unfolding and devel­opment.

Unfortunately, our history has been spotted with cold doctrinarianism and hard legalism, both enunciated and lived by some through our denomina­tional experience. Such is the clear evidence of our early documents. The reason is obvious. Growing up under the pitiless fire of critics of every per­suasion, it is not surprising that em­phasis on doctrine and prophecy as­sumed the ascendancy almost to the point of exclusion of certain spiritual truths and provisions.

But in due time, as God's will and message were studied further, God in His mercy sent a succession of direct messages to correct this tendency, and to perfect a people for His own pos­session who would repudiate all the errors introduced by the great apos­tasy. Many within our ranks had lost sight of Christ, and were depending upon human obedience instead of di­vine grace. Seeking to meet antino­mianism, some went to the other ex­treme. They ardently preached the law, but failed to preach Christ in the law. As a result, the lives of such were cold and loveless, and lacked much that God designed and desired for them.

It is a sobering, humbling thought that we have been so slow in accepting God's ideal proffered from the incep­tion of this movement. But it is most encouraging that in recent years there is such a widespread interest in the acceptance of these fuller provisions of grace that are to accompany the closing triumph of this blessed mes­sage.

In substantiation of these facts, read the witness and solemn charges of the Spirit of prophecy assembled in the book, " Christ Our Righteousness," by Elder A. G. Daniells. In the later 80's and early 90's this movement faced one of the greatest crises of its history to that time. The clash was between formalism and true spiritual life, the letter and the spirit, law and grace. It came into the open, and strong men were on both sides of the issue. Though the counsel of the Spirit of prophecy was thrown fully with those who were seeking to put Christ and His righteousness back into their rightful place, there was much op­position, and many were not per­suaded. And this spirit has not en­tirely passed.

Surely, if the contacts of those out­standing " outside " spiritual leaders with this message were with such sin­cere but mistaken members of this movement, who has the temerity to claim that failure to accept a par­tially distorted truth is equivalent to rejecting the full, balanced " truth as it is in Jesus "? Once having the clear light and experimental joy of righteousness by faith, which is di­vinely declared to be " the third an­gel's message in verity" (Review and Herald, April 1, 1890), they would in­stinctively recognize departures and perversions of the provisions of grace, and this would have a marked bear­ing upon their attitude toward accept­ing our distinctive doctrines. Pos­sibly it was necessary for God to use them outside His organized movement to stress certain neglected truths for that period.

As time draws to its fateful close, the spiritual will gain the ascendancy, not in conflict with the impregnable doctrinal foundations, but surcharging all with a divine balance and power. The development of apostasy in other bodies will force separations until there shall be indeed but one fold and one Shepherd. We need to keep in sympathetic touch with sincere Fundamentalists, for it is our conviction that a multitude of them will yet believe.

We reiterate our profound belief that this is God's message and God's movement, His last spiritual and re­formatory work among men, which will culminate in a company to be translated at Christ's appearing, now so near. There will be none at the last outside the " one fold " whom God will recognize as His own. But such a condition has not obtained in the past, and it is not fully true today. But throughout our history we have limited God, as it were, by our mis­conceptions, our slow understanding and following of His will. This sober­ing fact constitutes a clarion chal­lenge for harmonizing balance be­tween doctrinal truth and spiritual fellowship with Christ.                

L. E. F.

Advertisement - Ministry in Motion 300x250

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

L.E.F. is editor of the Ministry.

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - Southern Adv Univ 180x150 - Animated

Trending

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - NAD Stewardship (160x600)