Is Immunization Necessary?

Is Immunization Necessary?—No.3

Immunization against attacks of small-pox and diphtheria has been pointed out as a safe procedure. It has been shown that individuals should by all means avail them­selves of such protection at the proper time, not only to safeguard their own health, but also to avoid exposing others to the serious consequences which may result from these diseases.

By D. Lois Burnett, R. N

Immunization against attacks of small-pox and diphtheria has been pointed out as a safe procedure. It has been shown that individuals should by all means avail them­selves of such protection at the proper time, not only to safeguard their own health, but also to avoid exposing others to the serious consequences which may result from these diseases.

II. The "May-Be-Done" Group 

The second group of immunizations as cited previously in the classification of immunization procedures is the "may be done" group. Im­munization against typhoid fever and whooping cough is placed in this classification.

Typhoid Fever.—The incidence of typhoid fever has been markedly reduced the last three decades through public-health measures which have provided for safe drinking water ; pas­teurization of milk; pr6per handling of food supplies; disposal of human fecal waste with­out polluting water supplies, food, or the sur­face of the soil; government control of shellfish growing and shipment; and the eradi: cation of breeding places for flies. The educa­tion of the public regarding hand washing after use of the toilet, and instruction and supervi­sion of convalescent and chronic typhoid car­riers in personal hygiene, has also been a factor in reducing the incidence of the diseases.

Such public-health activities have been car­ried on more diligently in urban areas than in the rural communities. Consequently the disease continues to be more prevalent in the open country. All should use their influence to promote this phase of public health instruction.

Immunization against the disease is not nec­essary for the population as a whole, since thorough public sanitary measures consistently applied markedly reduce the occurrence of the disease. However, persons should avail them­selves of protection from typhoid fever through immunization if they are exposed to special hazards, as floods, earthquakes, and other disasters, in which sanitary arrangements have become disorganized ; if they must travel or live in countries in which the sanitation is poor ; if they have to live for a time under unsettled conditions, as in the army; or if they are physicians or nurses, and are likely to come in contact with the disease in the routine of their work. Such persons need to be reim­munized every two years.

Whooping Cough.—Immunization against whooping cough has also been placed in the "may-be-done" group, because scientific opinion is still divided concerning the usefulness of vaccines for this disease. One authoritative opinion is that the "use of prophylactic vaccination is recommended by some observers, but for public health practice it is still in the experi­mental stage. There is some evidence that attacks are milder in the vaccinated."

On the other hand, there are many well-qualified physicians who feel that young chil­dren should be inoculated with the vaccine available, since this is the only means for pro­tection, and in their opinion it will produce immunity in approximately fifty per cent of cases, and will lessen the severity of the disease in approximately another twenty-five per cent. They consider this procedure justifiable because of the severity of whooping cough in the pre­school child, particularly in the child younger than three years of age.

It should be noted that whooping cough begins very much like an ordinary cold, and that it is particularly communicable in the early catarrhal stage before the typical cough con­firms the diagnosis. These facts show why it is difficult to prevent the spread of the disease.

Children between six months and five years of age are most suscePtible, and after this there is some decrease in susceptibility. In cities, about half the reported cases of whooping cough are in children under five years of age, and ninety per cent in children under ten. The children in this age group should be kept away from children with cough and fever of any origin, particularly if whooping cough is known to be prevalent.

Children who develop whooping cough may communicate the disease to others for three weeks after the typical cough develops, and should not be allowed to re-enter school until the expiration of this period, and until released by the health-department physician. A public-health measure for the control of whooping cough in which all may participate is to report suspected and unreported cases to the health department, and to assist in protecting other children from exposure.

The "No" Group—Scarlet Fever

The third area of the immunization classifi­cation is the "no" group, and in it scarlet fever is listed. Since there is considerable contro­versy about the immunization procedure for this disease, such a classification may not be entirely justified, and it might have been more , logical to discuss the immunization for this disease in the "may-be-done" group.

Susceptibility to scarlet fever may be deter­mined by the administration of a skin test, known as the Dick test, which is performed in a manner similar to that used for the Schick test for diphtheria. The immunizing treatment for the disease consists of administering to individuals showing a positive-reaction to the Dick test, three or more doses of sterile toxin at weekly intervals. Evidence is available that a child who becomes negative to the Dick test following the immunizing treatment is as well protected against scarlet fever as the child who gives a negative Dick test as the result of an acquired natural immunity.'

According to Dr. William A. Howard, of Georgetown University, the objection to the immunization procedure is based on the fact that scarlet fever is not caused by one single organism, but by a group of organisms. He feels that the immunization technique, as now used, does not include all the group, and there­fore is impractical. He points out that since the reaction from the immunization procedure is so severe from each of the several injections, the individual might just as well risk an attack of the disease. "Active immunization of Dick-positive persons may be desired on a private basis, but is generally impracticable as a public-health measure.'

In summary, let it be noted that all persons, old and young, should be vaccinated for small­pox. All preschool children and those in the lower elementary grades should -be immunized against diphtheria. Persons who must live in an unsafe environment should keep themselves immunized against typhoid fever. Every pre­caution should be exercised to avoid exposure, particularly of children, to any disease, and particularly to those diseases for which no known immunization exists, or for which pro­tection may not be absolutely established. The advice of the family physician should be sought regarding protection from disease, and whenever symptoms of illness appear.                  

D. L. B.

Report of a Committee of the American Public Health Association, "The Control of Communicable Diseases," Reprint No. 1697, P. St. United States Government Printing, Office, Washington, D. C., 1940.

Veldee, M. V.—Scarlet Fever, Its Prevention and Control," Reprint No. 5202, p. so. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

3 Report of a Committee of the American Public Health Association, "The Control of Communicable Diseases," Reprint No. 1697, p. 36. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 1940.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By D. Lois Burnett, R. N

December 1941

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

The Smoke of a Thousand Cities!

One of our greatest challenges today is the task of reaching the unwarned cities.

The Economy of Sacrifice

The higher cost of living—now constantly mounting—will compel us to be more saving. But that saving must not be made at the ex­pense of foreign missions.

As Others See and Hear Us

It is not only what we say, but how we say it, that counts.

Evolution and the Sinfulness of Sin

The sinfulness of sin is invariably hidden to a greater or lesser degree from the perception of him who accepts the theory of organic evolution.

Statistical Summaries for 1940

Despite the confusion of unsettled years, the work of God in the world goes steadily forward.

The Crucible of Experience

Our monthly bible work column looks at a formative life experience.

The Pastor and the Home (Part III)

As his the head of the house is the father of his family, so the pastor, the head of the local church, is the father of his people.

Identifying the Bergundian Horn

Where in Europe can we locate the Burgun­dians as one of the ten tribes fulfilling the prophecy of Daniel 2 and 7?

The Prophecy on the Mount

From the Mount of Olives, two great mes­sages were proclaimed by the Great Teacher —the sermon on the mount and the prophecy on the mount. For those who are looking and longing for the coming of Jesus, the words of Matthew 24 and 25 are a combina­tion of timetable and guidebook.

Musical Sentences Needed

The monthly music column looks at the three elements of good music.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - RevivalandReformation 300x250

Recent issues

See All