Hymns for Church Services

The use of the word proper in referring to the selections of hymns for services of wor­ship strongly implies the existence of a stand­ard by which one estimates the propriety or the impropriety of a given hymn, aside from the purely personal decision of whether we like the hymn or not.

By RALPH S. LARSON, Licensed Minister, Hawaiian Mission

The use of the word proper in referring to the selections of hymns for services of wor­ship strongly implies the existence of a stand­ard by which one estimates the propriety or the impropriety of a given hymn, aside from the purely personal decision of whether we like the hymn or not.

It is entirely fitting and reasonable to the Ad­ventist mind that there should be such a stand­ard. We are trained to revere and respect various standards', such as the Bible and the law of God, and to abide by their dictates, re­gardless of personal inclination. It is well that we should have a standard. We have, however, not one, but two standards. I suspect them both to be imperfect.

The first, which we may speak of as the in­tellectual test, is advanced by many of our more highly trained musicians. The hymn or gospel song, according to this school of thought, should be accepted or rejected according to its appeal to the intellect. Emotional appeal and in­tellectual appeal are said to be incompatible, so if it appeals strongly to the senses, this would indicate that it is not acceptable.

The second standard, which perhaps may be spoken of as the emotional test, is adhered to by those who see no value in a hymn which ap­peals more or less abstractly to the intellect. They would accept or reject the hymn accord­ing to their ability to get the feel of it.

Needless to say, the devotees of each stand­ard are able to produce many strong arguments in their favor. This is frequently done, some­what to the confusion of the young minister, who must of necessity use hymns, and would like to arrive at some valid conclusion as to a sound basis of evaluating them. It is frequently represented to him as being a matter of deepest principle. It is a difficult thing for him to de­cide which standard he will accept and use. During his college days he is likely to be strongly influenced in both directions.

In my own experience I have seen some songs and choruses used which aroused only disgust in me. I have also traveled with a very talented choir whose repertoire included so much Bach, Brahms, and Palestrina that it be­came difficult to obtain an audience toward the end of the season. I have heard of the evange­list who said good night to his audience at the door, and observed, to his consternation, a cou­ple dancing down the aisle to the rhythm of a song being sung by the choir. I have also heard extolled the virtues of a certain highly trained organist who simply refused to play when a hymn was announced which did not meet with his approval. All of this caused me great be­wilderment and uncertainty until I discovered a true standard of judging music.

I believe the best standard for the selection of hymns and gospel songs is aptly expressed by the phrases the ministry of music. I submit that the primary function of music in any religious service is to minister to the spiritual needs of those for whom the service is planned. If we accept this premise, we have provided ourselves with a workable standard, and one not easily abused. If the question uppermost in our minds when we select a hymn is, "Will it minister to the spiritual needs of my congrega­tion?" there is little likelihood that we will make any of the gross blunders made by en­thusiastic proponents of either an intellectual or an emotional standard.

If the well-educated members of our congre­gation should not be insulted by the use of something cheap and trivial, the uneducated member has an equal right not to be bludgeoned with a highly intellectual hymn designed to ed­ucate him, but which for him has no message. In any circumstance the hymn that will fully minister to the spiritual needs of the congrega­tion is the hymn that should be used, and the hymn that is found wanting when judged by this criterion should be rejected, regardless of how ardently it may be praised by devotees of either the intellectual or emotional test. The congregations of our churches will rejoice when our use of church music becomes a true ministry of music.

Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

By RALPH S. LARSON, Licensed Minister, Hawaiian Mission

January 1948

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Ellen G. White—The Human Interest Story

Part one—as others knew her.

Imagination an Effective Tool

Imagination is one of the greatest tools which the preacher has to employ in winning souls for Christ.

Approach to the Jewish Problem *

*Miss Dzieciolska is speaking entirely of the Ortho­dox Jew in this study. She has promised to prepare a similar study on the Reformed Jew for a later issue of THE MINISTRY.

The Pastor's Assistant

Learning on the job.

Mechanical Preparation for an Effort

A look at the ten steps of Evangelistic preparation.

Advertising in Small Cities

If the community in which a campaign is to be held knows nothing of the meetings, how can the people attend?

Crusade for a United Church

A committee of sponsors consisting of thirty-two Protestant church laymen has been formed for the purpose of carrying on a crusade for a United Church of America.

The Form Without the Spirit

My visit to a prominent Protestant high church cathedral.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up

Recent issues

See All