Church or Night Club

Is Our Church Music Meeting God's Standard?

MELVIN HILL, Chairman, Music Department, Union College

THE extensive use of music in all facets of life today has left many with differing opinions and confused standards as to what music is ac­ceptable for church and other sacred usage. Can there be some definite principles to define these areas? I am happy there are so many questions re­garding sacred music; it indicates a sincere desire to evaluate and choose what is right in the sight of God.

It has been shown in previous articles that certain kinds of music lumped to­gether under the heading "jazz" have no place in the life of a Christian. Logically therefore, this type of music could have no legitimate place in religious services. I am sure all of my readers have noticed the in­vasion of Christian music by certain tech­niques of the entertainment world. This is deplorable! Gospel music and its perform­ance have been infiltrated by musical de­vices of Hollywood and the night club. To dress up gospel melodies in the garments of show business simply debases and cheap­ens the gospel.

There should be a clear distinction be­tween the secular and the sacred in music. Using popular music devices, such as gui­tars amplified loudly, discords, gliding ef­fects in singing, crooning, operatic style, ex­cessive rhythmic devices, imitating popular singers and styles, does nothing to enhance the worship service.

Common sense dictates that sacred asso­ciation be quite separate and distinct from secular. Language is different, architecture is generally distinguishable, even the seats are different. Practically no one would walk into a church, look at the pulpit, and think he was in a theater. So it should be with the music. There is a great danger in making no distinction between the secular and the sacred, or in introducing secular methods in our religious music. There are tradi­tional features about religious music that any educated man recognizes as belonging to the church, while there are secular qualities that the world recognizes as hav­ing no place inside a church or at a reli­gious meeting.

Some performers of religious music leave a great deal to be desired. Crooning in the popular style brings the music down to a mundane level. Sometimes the only indica­tion of the music being religious is the words. The dignity of religion calls for a higher type of song. Gospel songs should not be sung like sentimental love songs. Some religious records are sold in which the precious doctrines of redemption are unequally yoked with movie theater music or sung in the mood of cocktail hour bal­lads or accompanied on the organ, piano, or guitar as if in a night club.

The fact that TV and radio entertainers often sing religious music has helped to break down the line of demarcation be­tween the sacred and secular. Therefore, we should be all the more careful to keep out of all our religious meetings these defi­nite influences which belong to the enter­tainment world rather than to worship.

To play hymns and gospel songs without embellishment is sufficient. Attempts at bi­zarre effects may tickle the ear, but are hardly devotional. Sacred music is ideally best when far removed from secular sugges­tions.

It is right that we should enjoy music, such as Beethoven's symphonies and Strauss's tone poems, and it is also right that we should enjoy a lighter type of mu­sic, provided that it does not weaken our love for spiritual things. The danger lies in making no distinction between the secu­lar and sacred, or introducing secular meth­ods in sacred music.

The King James Bible has never been surpassed as literature because its style has none of the mannerisms of cheap, collo­quial literature. So true religious music, both in itself and in the manner of per­formance, should never make use of the passing devices and mannerisms of the cur­rently popular music of the world.

Paul's statement in Romans 12:2 is very appropriate today: "Don't let the world around you squeeze you into its own mold" (Phillips).*


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

MELVIN HILL, Chairman, Music Department, Union College

November 1966

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

The New Quadrennium's Watchword—Evangelism!

What should guide us in plotting the future and directing God's work in all the world divisions?

"I sought a man"

Central to the proclamation of the everlasting gospel is the living preacher.

The Old Man and Conversion

What is the relationship between the death of the old man in Romans 6:6 and the experiences of conversion and sanctification?

Ingathering Time Again

The need for organization and enthusiasm in our work.

Christ and the Church

Is it biblical to say one is not accountable to the church but only to Christ?

Reaching the Masses

The recognition of the Ecumenical Council of the need to study the Scriptures is a golden opportunity for Seventh-day Adventists to carry the Bible to their neighbors and friends, and to urge them to become acquainted with God's plan for their lives.

Goa Opens Up

The command to "Go" to Goa that came in January, 1966.

God's Miracle Man* (Part 1)

Do you believe in miracles?

Should Christians Stop Proselyting?

Evangelism is the genius of Christianity.

The Challenge of Buddhism

One of the greatest challenges that faces the Seventh-day Adventist Church is the gigantic task of presenting the gospel of Christ to the teeming millions of non-Christians in all parts of the world.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up

Recent issues

See All
Advertisement - SermonView - WideSkyscraper (160x600)