Encounter or Enrichment—what's the difference?

You know that couples in your church could benefit from a marriage betterment program, and you've heard of some but you're probably wondering.

As a pastor, you may find yourself somewhat confused by the current variety of programs designed to build better marriages and happier homes. However, two programs in the Seventh-day Adventist Church have nationwide organizations, and leaders that conform quite closely to their respective models. They are Adventist Marriage Enrichment and the Adventist expression of Marriage Encounter (designated hereafter as "Enrichment" and "Encounter").

The two models have a number of things in common:

1. Both take the preventive approach. They seek to make good marriages better rather than try to rescue those on the point of shipwreck.

2. Both focus on spiritual oneness. God is made the center of all marital activity.

3. Both deal heavily in communication skills. Couples are taught how to share with each other, especially on a feeling level, in a way that will bring mutual understanding and intimacy.

4. Both teach conflict resolution. Couples learn how to be honest with each other, and yet loving, at the same time.

5. Both teach the value of affirmation and appreciation.

6. Both launch the experience with a weekend seminar from Friday night to Sunday afternoon.

7. Both continue the experience with follow-up chapters that meet periodically.

8. Both have a training program for seminar leaders.

Given such similarities, you might easily have some difficulty keeping the two programs straight, deciding in which you might wish to become a leader or which to foster in your local congregation. The following points should help you tell the difference:

1. Background. Encounter was adapted from a Catholic program and put into an Adventist structure by Al and Betty Brendel. Enrichment was originally a secular organization (Associated Couples for Marriage Enrichment) led by a Quaker couple, David and Vera Mace. It was adapted for Adventists by Ed and Letah Banks.

2. Methodology. In Encounter, prepared presentations are made to the entire group of couples. Then they go to their own rooms to write letters to each other and discuss the material presented and their feelings toward it. There is no group interaction. Enrichment uses group dynamics, in which the couples sit in a circle, share information, practice skills, and support and encourage one another.

3. Size. Encounter can take as many couples as can be seated in the presentation room and for which individual rooms can be provided. Because of the group interaction, Enrichment must be limited to no more than ten couples.

4. Structure. Encounter is well structured, with nearly every minute carefully planned. Enrichment is informal and flexible. Some structure is provided, especially in the early sessions, but the direction the seminar may take is deter mined greatly by the interests and concerns of the group.

5. Fellowship. Encounter encourages communication between husband and wife only (even while moving from meeting place to individual rooms). It desires the couple to concentrate on each other alone for the one weekend. Enrichment encourages group fellowship, sharing of experiences, praying with other couples, and mutual support.

6. Location. Encounter always takes place in a retreat setting where the couples have a private room and meals are provided. While Enrichment could easily function in this environment, the couples usually live at home and come in to the group meetings, which may be held in a school, church, or private home.

7. Cost. Because of the setting, Encounter costs considerably more to operate than does Enrichment. However, both programs charge only a nominal fee ($15 to $20 per couple), and no couple is excluded who cannot pay. Encounter raises the rest of its expenses by donations. Couples are informed of the actual cost and encouraged to donate to future weekends, though they are not obligated to do so.

8. Leadership. Encounter requires a team of four or five couples who can invest considerable time working together in program development. Therefore, it is usually found in larger Adventist centers where this kind of talent may be grouped. Enrichment needs only the leadership couple, and thus can be organized nearly anywhere.

The question is often raised, Which program is better? The answer depends on the people and the circumstances. The two programs are not in competition with each other. Both have the same aims, but use different approaches. Some people will not like Encounter because of its structure and "monastic" rules. They will find it very difficult to talk to their spouse alone, on a deep level, for a whole weekend. On the other hand, many will find it to be a life-changing experience.

Some will have nothing to do with Enrichment. They are leery of anything like a group experience and are unwilling to share themselves with others. Yet, many find not only their marriages but their entire Christian lives revitalized in such groups.

For the participant the question may well be: In which program will I feel more comfortable? For the pastor or other leader it may be: Which program better fits my personal leadership style? The church may ask: What resources do we possess to develop these programs?


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus

February 1982

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Uplift Christ

It is no less true in the twentieth century than it was in the first, that the cross is foolishness to the great majority of mankind. But to those who are being saved it is the power of God. William G. Johnsson looks at Paul's famous statement in 1 Corinthians 1:18-31 in light of our mission to hold up before the world Christ and Him crucified.

One thousand days of reaping

The church faces many critical situations today, but none so crucial as her sense of mission. W. B. Quigley, recently appointed by the General Conference to lead out in a program of giving absolute priority to evangelism, emphasizes why this is so vital.

EGW: a biography

With the first in a six-volume biography of his grandmother off the press, the author talks with MINISTRY about the scope and purpose of this literary undertaking.

Bound in heaven

Our common human tendency is to evaluate everything in terms of its effect upon ourselves. More than we do, we need to realize that earthly events in salvation have definite repercussions in heaven.

A troubling dream in the night

Many of us started out as successful pastor-evangelists, but over the years something happened. Not only have many of us middle-aged old-timers lost our zeal but we aren't setting an example for younger ministers.

The servant-leader

The servant-leader has for his example Jesus Christ, who came to minister and to give His life. Our church is built around such servant-leaders kind, generous, noble, Christian servant-leaders.

Morale in ministry—a study of the pastor's wife as a person

Along with her pastor husband, the woman in the parsonage is facing discouragement and frustration. Yet she still finds joy and fulfillment in working alongside her husband in soul winning and nurture.

Recommended Reading

Two books on church growth are featured this month. One is a compendium of current information; the other provides examples of how churches grow and how to implement church growth in a congregation.

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - SermonView - Medium Rect (300x250)

Recent issues

See All