Does it really matter?

Why give nearly an entire issue to the question of how life began? We're here, and we need to get on with the business of living. Does the Creation-evolution debate touch us where we actually live today?

J.R. Spangler is the editor of Ministry.
This issue of MINISTRY focuses on a cardinal doctrine held and taught by the Seventh-day Adventist Church throughout its history. We believe "that the first thirty-five verses of the book of Genesis contain a valid, factual account of literal events that occurred during seven consecutive rotations of Planet Earth—the Creation week. This interpretation places within Creation week the origin of the parent stock for all organisms supported by the planet and also the origin of the physical circumstances on which the continuing life of this parent stock depends."—The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, vol. 1, p. 46.

The creationist's model of earth's history includes the concepts that our planet was modified as a result of the Fall and that its surface was radically trans formed in a post-Creation, universal flood. We are fully aware that this belief places us at odds with the widely held evolutionary model.

Several points need to be emphasized in our discussion of this most important subject. Serious reflection on these matters, in my opinion, reveals that turning from the Biblical account of a literal creation, fall, and flood and accepting the spontaneous origin of life and its slow development over hundreds of millions of years has far greater theological implications than most Christians recognize.

In the contemporary Christian world, theistic evolution has been promoted by numerous scholars and religious leaders. Theistic evolution suggests that God used natural selection, operating over long periods of time to develop life on our earth. This Christian humanistic model differs from the basic atheistic evolutionary model mainly in its introduction of God—the evolutionary principles and time frame are essentially the same. Obviously, this model avoids tension with the scientific community. But it must be evaluated on the basis of the authority and testimony of the Scriptures.

People generally overlook the fact that the verification of any model of origins lies beyond the scope of scientific procedure. Empirical evidence for the origin of the universe, and specifically our planet with its varied forms of life, is absolutely nonexistent! Although the available evidence can be interpreted in support of a particular model of origins, in the final analysis one must have faith to accept any of the models offered.

We believe that Scripture teaches a fiat creation and that there is logical and reasonable evidence, although not proof, that justifies taking the Biblical record literally. Seventh-day Adventist sponsorship of the Geoscience Research Institute witnesses to the strength of our commitment to this teaching. (For more on the founding of the Geoscience Research Institute, its purposes, and the importance of Creation to the Seventh-day Adventist Church, see MINISTRY, June, 1983.) The members of this institute, who all hold doctorates in various scientific disciplines, spend their full time in research, writing, and lecturing on creationism. As far as I know, ours is the only Christian church that supports such an entity. We feel it is money well spent, since the work relates directly to a most important doctrine of Scripture.

In fact, nothing in the Bible is more basic than its claim that God is the Creator. The Scriptures begin with the simple statement "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." Then follow the details of a creation that took place in a six-day period. Some may speculate about the length of time involved in the Genesis narrative, but one cannot do so when it comes to the details and specific time given in the fourth commandment. The statement "For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is" (Ex. 20:11) makes sense only in the framework of a literal six-day Creation week, with a seventh-day Sabbath memorial of Creation. It is most significant that God's arbitrary use of seven days for the Creation week is the only satisfactory explanation for the weekly cycle we have today.

As to the importance of Creation, a quick survey of texts reveals that the Scriptures identify His creation of the heavens, earth, and mankind as that which marks the difference between the true God and the plethora of false gods, and establishes Him as authoritative in contrast to them. (See Isa.,40:25, 26; 42:5; 43:1; 44:6-21; 45:8-12, 18; Jonah 1:9; Acts 17:22-26.)

On earth our Lord displayed His magnificent creative power in restoring health to diseased bodies, sight to blind eyes, and life to dead beings. It was the same life-giving voice that brought the world into existence, that also made men who were physically and spiritually dead come to life!

That same Person will speak again—and create a new heaven and a new earth when He returns the second time (see 2 Peter 3:10-13). This climactic event will not take eons of time. No evolutionary process will be involved in the restoration of all things to their Edenic beauty. It will be a repeat performance of the original creation. The resurrection of the righteous dead magnificently demonstrates that God needs little time to re-create. They will be raised "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye" (see 1 Cor. 15:51-54). If there is a "fiat creation" of life at the end-time, why couldn't there have been a "fiat creation" at the beginning of time?

Does it really matter? Many questions will have to remain unanswered, but we believe this special issue demonstrates that credible scientific evidence does exist to support the historicity of Gene sis. How one views the origin of life has an impact on how he views life itself. It does matter—J.R.S.


Ministry reserves the right to approve, disapprove, and delete comments at our discretion and will not be able to respond to inquiries about these comments. Please ensure that your words are respectful, courteous, and relevant.

comments powered by Disqus
J.R. Spangler is the editor of Ministry.

May 1984

Download PDF
Ministry Cover

More Articles In This Issue

Darwin's Revolution

Darwin did not burst upon an unsuspecting world with his idea of natural selection as the mechanism by which species evolved. Careful observations had been going on for decades. His book caught the public eye (and sold out in a single day) because of an increasing discontent with the Biblical view of origins and a worldwide destruction by flood. Readers either accepted his ideas eagerly or unswervingly opposed him.

Creation, evolution, or other views?

The choice is not merely God or nature. Between divine creation and naturalistic evolution lie a number of intermediate positions that attempt to bring about some accommodation. Is this possible? The author summarizes these positions and their implications for both science and Scripture.

Evidences for creation

The rich dimensions of human life, both physically and in those areas that penetrate to the essence of what life is about, reveal something about the Designer. No one was around at the origin of life, so all theories about it are really not susceptible to proof. But we can find evidences for the different ideas about origins. Creation by a divine Creator is the only theory that takes into account all that life is.

Evidences for a worldwide flood

Some of the data in the rocks pose problems for one who believes in a literal worldwide flood such as described in Genesis. Such problems need to be recognized. Yet the rocks also present a number of difficulties to the one who believes a worldwide flood never happened. In fact, some features can hardly be explained apart from a water catastrophe of a magnitude greater than anything experienced in modern times.

Evolution confronts Christianity

The following article begins with a look at what constitutes the evolutionary theory, indicates the inconsistency of the principles underlying it with the basic principles of Christianity, and then discusses how it relates to some of the Christian doctrines.

Major objections to Creation and how we answer them

A number of scientific interpretations conflict with the Creation account as depicted in Genesis. The major ones are briefly considered here. For some there are good answers; for others, not. In this article, the staff of the Geoscience Research Institute candidly present the most serious objections raised against the creationist position. The reader ought to be aware, however, that the scientific evidence for Creation cannot be adequately evaluated on the basis of objections only.

Shepherdess: The Stature Seekers

Even in the religious world, and even among ministerial families, status rather than stature can easily become the goal If we want to indulge ambition, Scripture encourages us to seek stature to the fullest.

In search of the silver bullet

Can't creationists come up with some evidence so spectacular and overwhelming that evolutionists will be forced to watch their theories crumple into a heap? Such a search is futile, says the author, and may lead to something less than objectivity.

Sermons from Psalms

We read from the Psalms at hospital bedsides, at weddings, and at funerals. We use them devotionally and we even sing some of them. But we rarely preach from them. And the reason, the author suggests, is because we don't really understand them. Here's how you can get into preaching from the Psalms in a way that will make them mean something to the people in your pews.

Recommended Reading

Monthly Book Reviews

View All Issue Contents

Digital delivery

If you're a print subscriber, we'll complement your print copy of Ministry with an electronic version.

Sign up
Advertisement - SermonView - Medium Rect (300x250)

Recent issues

See All